Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in dilated cardiomyopathy: impact of left ventricular
Beat A Schaer1, Peter Ammann, Christian Sticherling
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. bschaer@uhbs.ch
Insights
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) show benefits for secondary prevention. Primary prevention ICD use in DCM requires caution, especially for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 20%.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- The efficacy of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains uncertain, with prior trials showing no survival advantage over drug therapy.
- Limited investigation exists on whether patients with severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) benefit from ICD implantation for primary prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of ICD implantation in patients with DCM, differentiating between secondary and primary prevention strategies.
- To assess the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the effectiveness of ICDs in DCM patients.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 58 DCM patients who received an ICD between 1996 and 2003 were analyzed.
- Patients were categorized into secondary prevention (Group A) and primary prevention (Group B).
- Both groups were stratified based on LVEF: <20% and >20%.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in mortality was observed between Group A (18%) and Group B (11%).
- Group A showed significantly higher rates of adverse events (55% vs. 22%), any ICD intervention (48% vs. 17%), and life-threatening arrhythmia interventions (27% vs. 0%) compared to Group B.
- In primary prevention (Group B), only patients with LVEF <20% experienced events, while LVEF was not predictive in Group A. A significant LVEF increase (>15%) occurred in 36% of patients, more frequently in Group B.
Conclusions:
- ICD implantation for primary prevention in DCM should be approached cautiously.
- Further research is necessary to determine the specific benefit of ICDs for DCM patients with LVEF <20%.
Background:
The value of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is unclear, as randomized trials could not show a survival benefit compared to drug therapy. It has not been investigated if patients with a very poor left ventricular function (LVEF) could profit from an ICD.
Methods:
Consecutive patients with DCM who received an ICD between December 1996 and November 2003 were included in this analysis. Patients were divided in group A (secondary prevention) and group B (primary prevention). Both groups were stratified in subgroups with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below and above 20%.
Results:
Fifty eight patients were included (male 50, age 56.4+/-12.7 years). Follow-up was 34+/-19 months. There was no difference regarding death (18% vs. 11%), but significant differences (p value <0.05) regarding any adverse events (55% vs. 22%), any ICD intervention (48% vs. 17%) and ICD interventions for life-threatening arrhythmias (27% vs. 0%) between group A and B. LVEF was not predictive for events in group A, whereas in group B only patients with a LVEF <20% had events (p value 0.02). Over time there was an increase of the LVEF of more than 15% determined by echocardiography in 36% of patients, significantly more often in group B.
Conclusions:
Indication for primary prevention with an ICD in DCM should be made with caution. Larger studies are needed to determine if patients with LVEF of <20% might benefit from an ICD.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

