Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Determining cause and effect in herds.

John M Gay1

  • 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, AAHP Field Disease Investigation Unit, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, 99164-6610, USA.

The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice
|March 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Longitudinal observation of meticillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus pseudintermedius</i> pulsotypes in six veterinary hospitals in the north-western United States.

Veterinary record open·2022
Same author

Prevalence of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus pseudintermedius</i> on hand-contact and animal-contact surfaces in companion animal community hospitals.

The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne·2020
Same author

Prevalence of Fecal Salmonella Shedding by Cull Dairy Cattle Marketed in Washington State.

Journal of food protection·2019
Same author

Interactive effects of dexamethasone and opsonized Mycoplasma bovis on bovine neutrophil function in vitro.

Veterinary immunology and immunopathology·2018
Same author

Cardiopulmonary Effects of Constant-Rate Infusion of Lidocaine for Anesthesia during Abdominal Surgery in Goats.

Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS·2016
Same author

Effects of an optional clinical skills laboratory on surgical performance of third-year veterinary students.

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2016
Same journal

Nutritional Management of Beef Stocker Calves in Grazing Systems.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice·2026
Same journal

Strategies for Data-Driven Investigations of Disease and Decreased Production on Stocker Operations.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice·2026
Same journal

Nonrespiratory Diseases of Stocker Cattle.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice·2026
Same journal

The Role of Early Handling Experiences on the Welfare of Beef Stocker Cattle.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice·2026
Same journal

Stocker Production Medicine: An Emerging Area of Specialization in Modern Food Animal Practice.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice·2026
Same journal

Immunology of Beef Stocker Cattle.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice·2026
See all related articles

This article explains how to determine cause and effect logically and identifies common cognitive errors in medical decision-making. Awareness of these reasoning errors can help clinicians improve diagnostic accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Medical decision-making
  • Cognitive science
  • Logic and reasoning

Background:

  • Medical diagnosis relies on understanding cause and effect.
  • Cognitive biases can impair medical decision-making.
  • Logical reasoning is crucial for accurate clinical judgment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the logical process for determining cause and effect.
  • To identify common cognitive errors in medical decision-making.
  • To enhance clinicians' awareness of potential reasoning pitfalls.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual framework for cause and effect determination.
  • Analysis of logical principles in causal inference.
  • Categorization of cognitive biases in clinical reasoning.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Key components of logical causal inference are presented.
  • Common cognitive errors, such as confirmation bias and availability heuristic, are detailed.
  • The relationship between logical fallacies and diagnostic errors is explored.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding logical reasoning enhances diagnostic accuracy.
  • Awareness of cognitive errors is essential for mitigating medical mistakes.
  • Improved critical thinking skills can lead to better patient outcomes.