Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison between custom and noncustom spinal orthoses.

Gene P Bernardoni1, Thomas M Gavin

  • 1Ballert Orthopedic of Chicago, 2434 West Peterson Avenue, Chicago, IL 60659, USA. info@ballert-op.com

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
|March 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stability of the Scoliotic Spine: Effect of Scoliosis Braces.

Spine·2016
Same author

Biomechanical analysis of cervical orthoses in flexion and extension: a comparison of cervical collars and cervical thoracic orthoses.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2004
Same author

Effect of compressive follower preload on the flexion-extension response of the human lumbar spine.

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2003
Same journal

Preface.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Pain Unbound: A Comprehensive Review.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Dual Frontiers Cancer and Palliative Care.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Pain Management Across Special Populations: Pediatrics, Geriatrics, and Pregnancy.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Healing from Within: Regenerative Medicine in Pain Therapy.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Brain in Pain: Exploring Central Pain Disorders.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Off-the-shelf (OTS) orthoses are economical but less effective than custom-molded thoracolumbosacral orthoses (TLSOs). Custom-molded TLSOs offer superior fit, support, and patient compliance, making them the most cost-effective choice for optimal clinical outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthotics and Biomechanics
  • Spinal Bracing Technology

Background:

  • Economically priced off-the-shelf (OTS) orthoses have limitations in motion control compared to custom-fitted devices.
  • Patient outcomes and satisfaction are critical considerations in orthotic selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of OTS orthoses versus custom-molded thoracolumbosacral orthoses (TLSOs).
  • To evaluate the impact of orthotic type on patient compliance and clinical outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of motion control capabilities between OTS and custom-molded TLSOs.
  • Assessment of fit, support, and wearer compliance for both orthotic types.
  • Cost-effectiveness evaluation based on clinical outcomes and device attributes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Custom-molded TLSOs demonstrate superior motion control compared to OTS counterparts.
  • Custom-molded TLSOs provide enhanced fit and support, leading to improved patient compliance.
  • OTS orthoses may be suitable for specific, limited treatment objectives but not for optimal motion control.

Conclusions:

  • Custom-molded TLSOs are the preferred option for superior fit, support, and patient compliance, ensuring better clinical outcomes.
  • Patients should be prescribed custom-molded TLSOs when optimal motion control is required, avoiding less effective OTS alternatives.
  • Custom-molded TLSOs represent the most cost-effective solution for achieving desired treatment goals in spinal bracing.