Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens.

John R Srigley1

  • 1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. jsrigley@cvh.on.ca

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|March 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Accurate prognostic factor analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens is crucial for guiding prostate cancer treatment and patient prognosis. Key factors include Gleason score, pathologic stage, and margin status for effective patient management.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Precursor Lesions: Working Group 4 Precursor Lesions of Testis Results of a Premeeting Survey.

The American journal of surgical pathology·2026
Same author

Second edition ICCR dataset for testicular germ cell tumours: a reporting guide for histopathological diagnosis of orchiectomy specimens.

Histopathology·2025
Same author

Genitourinary Pathology Society and International Society of Urological Pathology White Paper on Defining Indolent Prostate Cancer.

The American journal of surgical pathology·2025
Same author

Current practices in prostate pathology reporting: results from a survey of genitourinary and general pathologists.

Histopathology·2025
Same author

Genitourinary Pathology Society and International Society of Urological Pathology White Paper on Defining Indolent Prostate Cancer: Call for a Multidisciplinary Approach.

European urology·2025
Same author

Acceptance of emerging renal oncocytic neoplasms: a survey of urologic pathologists.

Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology·2024

Area of Science:

  • Pathology
  • Oncology
  • Surgical Pathology

Background:

  • Radical prostatectomy is a common treatment for prostatic adenocarcinoma, but specimen handling and reporting are challenging.
  • Pathologic findings from prostatectomy specimens are vital for adjuvant therapy selection and prognosis determination.
  • Systematic handling of prostate specimens is essential for deriving accurate prognostic parameters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review prognostic factors for classifying radical prostatectomy specimens.
  • To utilize the College of American Pathologists categorization system.
  • To focus on morphologic factors, excluding markers like DNA ploidy and novel genetic markers.

Main Methods:

  • Review of prognostic factors relevant to radical prostatectomy specimens.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of the College of American Pathologists categorization system.
  • Detailed survey of morphologic factors.

    • Main Results:

    • Category 1 factors (Gleason score, pathologic stage, margin status) have proven prognostic significance.
    • Category 2 factors (tumor volume, tumor subtype) show promise but require validation.
    • Category 3 factors (lymphovascular space invasion, perineural invasion) require further study.

    Conclusions:

    • Category 1 prognostic factors are critical for patient management.
    • Standardized reporting, such as synoptic reporting, ensures clear communication of complex findings.
    • Evidence-based checklists facilitate effective reporting for patient care, education, research, and quality monitoring.