Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assisted dying.

Raymond Hoffenberg1

  • 1Royal College of Physicians.

Clinical Medicine (London, England)
|March 9, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Assisted dying remains controversial, with palliative care not always relieving suffering. This article argues for assisted dying, suggesting medical professionals lag behind public opinion on end-of-life choices.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advance healthcare directives.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2006
Same author

Brenner, the worm and the prize.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2003
Same author

The Steve Biko case: appeal for funds for court action against South African Medical and Dental Council.

British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·1984
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Palliative Care
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • The Royal College of Physicians adopted a neutral stance on the Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill.
  • Modern palliative care and hospice approaches have improved terminal symptom management but do not always eliminate suffering.
  • A significant portion of dying patients and their families may not receive optimal end-of-life care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To rebut common arguments against physician-assisted dying.
  • To present arguments in favor of assisted dying.
  • To highlight a potential disconnect between medical professional opinions and public sentiment regarding end-of-life options.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and critical analysis of existing arguments.
  • Synthesis of ethical considerations surrounding assisted dying.
  • Comparison of medical professional stances with public opinion data (implied).

Main Results:

  • Common arguments against assisted dying were addressed and refuted.
  • Arguments supporting assisted dying were presented.
  • Evidence suggests a divergence between medical professional views and majority public opinion on assisted dying.

Conclusions:

  • Assisted dying warrants further consideration despite advancements in palliative care.
  • The medical profession's perspective on assisted dying may not align with broader societal views.
  • Re-evaluating the medical community's position on assisted dying in light of public opinion is suggested.

Related Experiment Videos