Related Experiment Videos
Memory strength and recency judgments.
1Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA. hintzman@uoregon.edu
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|March 10, 2006
Summary
Memory strength influences judgments of recency. Stronger memories are perceived as more recent, supporting the activation hypothesis in numerical judgment of recency (JOR) studies.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human Memory
Background:
- Numerical judgment of recency (JOR) is influenced by memory characteristics.
- The relationship between memory strength and perceived recency requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of memory strength on numerical judgment of recency (JOR).
- To contrast the activation hypothesis (stronger memories seem more recent) with the accuracy hypothesis (JOR is more accurate for stronger memories).
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted manipulating memory strength.
- Stimulus type (pictures vs. names) and study duration (long vs. short) were used to define memory strength.
- Participants performed numerical judgment of recency tasks.
Main Results:
- Both experiments provided support for the activation hypothesis.
- Stronger memory items were judged as more recent compared to weaker items.
- No support was found for the accuracy hypothesis.
Conclusions:
- Memory strength significantly influences the perception of recency.
- Recency judgments are partly inferred from memory activation and partly from other time-related cues.
- Findings contribute to understanding the mechanisms underlying temporal memory retrieval.