Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning curve using robotic surgery.

Sanjeev Kaul1, Nikhil L Shah, Mani Menon

  • 1Vattikuti Urology Institute, 2799 West grand Boulevard, K-9, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. skaul1@hfhs.org

Current Urology Reports
|March 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robotic surgery: The beginning and the journey so far.

The National medical journal of India·2026
Same author

Re: Rebecca Voelker. What Is Prostate Cancer? JAMA. In press. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.10177.

European urology·2025
Same author

Prostate cancer in situ autovaccination with the intratumoral viral mimic poly-ICLC: Modulating the cold tumor microenvironment.

Med (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Diagnostic Value of Micro-Ultrasound in Identifying Local Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.

The Prostate·2025
Same author

Mortality and Additional Treatment Rates in Pathologically High-Risk Prostate Cancer With Prostate-Specific Antigen Persistence at Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Long-Term Report From Single Tertiary Referral Center.

The Prostate·2025
Same author

Long-term Cancer Control Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Pathologically Non-organ-confined High-risk Prostate Cancer: 20-year Report from a Single Tertiary Referral Center.

European urology focus·2025
Same journal

Effective Mentorship in Urology Fellowship Training: Qualities, Models, and Equity.

Current urology reports·2026
Same journal

Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.

Current urology reports·2026
Same journal

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms as an Indicator of Occult Neurologic Disease: A System-first Framework for Urologic Practice.

Current urology reports·2026
Same journal

Association Between Ambient Temperature and Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Current urology reports·2026
Same journal

Is Open Partial Nephrectomy Still an Option in the Robotic Era?

Current urology reports·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Documentation: A Review of Emerging Capabilities and the Ongoing Need for Human Oversight.

Current urology reports·2026
See all related articles

Robotic surgery training is crucial for surgeons transitioning from open or laparoscopic procedures. Understanding the learning curve and assessing proficiency are key to developing effective training protocols for robotic surgical skills.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Technology
  • Medical Education

Background:

  • The da Vinci surgical system is increasingly adopted across various specialties.
  • Robotic surgery differs from open and laparoscopic approaches due to remote control, stereoscopic vision, and absent haptic feedback.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the learning curve and skill acquisition in robotic surgery.
  • To compare surgical skill acquisition between conventional laparoscopy and robotic interfaces.
  • To establish standards for robotic surgical training and proficiency assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current gold standards for assessing surgical skill training.
  • Comparative analysis of learning curves and surgical dexterity in laparoscopy versus robotic surgery.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Robotic surgery presents unique challenges in skill acquisition compared to traditional methods.
  • Assessment of proficiency requires understanding specific robotic learning curves.

Conclusions:

  • Effective training protocols and proficiency standards are essential for the safe and efficient adoption of robotic surgery.
  • Further research into robotic surgical skill acquisition and assessment is warranted.