Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perception01:28

Perception

Perception is a fundamental psychological process that enables individuals to organize, interpret, and consciously experience sensory information. This process is crucial for understanding and interacting with the world around us. It includes both bottom-up and top-down processing, each playing a distinct role in how we perceive our environment.
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A psychological-scaling approach to unraveling the nature of Pigeons' categorization of natural visual objects.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

A multidimensional-scaling study of images from diverse everyday-object categories.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Tests of a hybrid-similarity exemplar model of context-dependent memorability in a high-dimensional real-world category domain.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

High-variability training does not enhance generalization in the prototype-distortion paradigm.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same author

Modeling within-session dynamics of categorical and item-memory mechanisms in pigeons.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

Testing formal cognitive models of classification and old-new recognition in a real-world high-dimensional category domain.

Cognitive psychology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Procedural interference in perceptual classification: implicit learning or cognitive complexity?

Robert M Nosofsky1, Roger D Stanton, Safa R Zaki

  • 1Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. nosofsky@indiana.edu

Memory & Cognition
|March 15, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Category learning complexity, not distinct systems, explains performance differences. Procedural interference impacts rule-based categories more than information integration, challenging prior assumptions about implicit learning systems.

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Learning Sciences

Background:

  • Previous research proposed distinct learning systems for different category structures: implicit procedural learning for information integration and explicit learning for rule-based categories.
  • A key piece of evidence was the dissociation where procedural interference affected information integration but not rule-based categories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether category complexity, rather than distinct underlying systems, accounts for the observed dissociation in procedural interference.
  • To re-examine the role of procedural learning in information integration versus rule-based category learning.

Main Methods:

  • The study employed procedural interference tasks across various rule-based and information integration category structures.
  • Manipulated category complexity and rule complexity to observe effects on performance.
  • Utilized sensitive testing conditions to detect subtle performance changes.

Main Results:

  • Procedural interference was observed even in simple rule-based categories under more sensitive conditions.
  • The magnitude of procedural interference increased with greater rule complexity.
  • Cognitively simple information integration structures showed significantly reduced procedural interference.

Conclusions:

  • The findings challenge the established view of separate procedural and explicit learning systems for different category types.
  • Category complexity and difficulty appear to be the primary drivers of the observed interference patterns, not the nature of the category structure itself.
  • Re-evaluates the role of implicit procedural learning in category acquisition and performance.