Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

05:37
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Putting community risk in perspective: a look at correlations, causes and controls
1Sociology and Anthropology, NCSU Campus, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. ginnie_aldige@ncsu.edu
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
|March 15, 2006
Summary
Research linking severe mental illness and violence is often misleading, contributing to stigma. This review examines the complex relationship, statistical issues, and effective community risk management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Criminology
- Public Health
Background:
- The association between severe mental illness and violence is frequently reported but often oversimplified.
- This perception contributes significantly to the stigma faced by individuals with severe mental illness.
- Existing research requires critical examination to understand the nuances of this relationship.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically review the evidence linking severe mental illness and violence.
- To identify and analyze statistical confounds in reported correlations.
- To explore causal mechanisms and their implications for community risk management and legal interventions.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review of studies investigating severe mental illness and violence.
- Critical analysis of statistical methodologies and potential biases.
- Examination of research focusing on causal pathways and risk factors.
Main Results:
- Many studies reporting a link between severe mental illness and violence are statistically confounded.
- Causal mechanisms, when identified, offer insights into managing risk rather than direct prediction.
- Legal interventions must consider these mechanisms for effective community safety.
Conclusions:
- The simplistic portrayal of severe mental illness as inherently violent is inaccurate and harmful.
- Understanding statistical confounds and causal pathways is crucial for accurate risk assessment.
- Evidence-based strategies informed by causal mechanisms can improve community safety and reduce stigma.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Correlation and Causation
Correlation and CausationStatistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. A relationship between variables shows correlation, but it does not show cause-and-effect. A direct cause-and-effect relationship requires additional controlled experiments. If no consistent relationship exists between the variables, then there is no correlation.Correlation versus CausationIf the dependent variable increases or decreases when the...
Hazard Ratio
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?