Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Polymerization efficiency of different photocuring units through ceramic discs.

Heiki Jung, Karl-Heinz Friedl, Karl-Anton Hiller

    Operative Dentistry
    |March 16, 2006
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study tested how well different light sources can cure a dental resin through ceramic discs of varying thickness. Researchers placed resin material under 1 mm and 2 mm ceramic discs and used six types of light curing units, including halogen, LED, and plasma arc. They measured how deep the resin cured and its hardness. The results showed that thicker ceramic discs reduced the effectiveness of all light sources, with some units performing worse than others. The study also found that adding a self-curing catalyst improved results compared to using light alone. These findings suggest that clinicians should consider ceramic thickness and light source type when bonding ceramic restorations.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Development of standard protocols for biofilm-biomaterial interface testing.

    JADA foundational science·2026
    Same author

    Randomized split-mouth clinical trial of CAD-CAM-partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement or with a conventional resin cement combined with a universal adhesive after 12 years.

    Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials·2025
    Same author

    Cytotoxicity testing of dental materials: Establishment of a 3D-printed dentin barrier culture system.

    Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials·2025
    Same author

    Optimal Effective Concentration Combinations and synergy evaluations for binary antimicrobial combinations <i>in vitro</i>.

    Frontiers in microbiology·2025
    Same author

    Gold vs. CAD/CAM ceramic partial-crowns: 20-year randomized clinical study.

    Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials·2025
    Same author

    Thrombocytopenia During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adult Patients With Bacterial, Viral, and COVID-19 Pneumonia.

    ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)·2025

    Area of Science:

    • Dental materials science
    • Polymer chemistry in restorative dentistry
    • Light curing technology in clinical dentistry

    Background:

    Prior research has shown that ceramic restorations can interfere with light transmission, affecting polymerization of resin-based materials. It was already known that ceramic thickness influences the depth of cure and mechanical properties of luting agents. No prior work had resolved how different light sources perform under varying ceramic thicknesses. This gap motivated a study to compare polymerization efficiency across multiple light curing units. The need for reliable luting agents in ceramic restorations remains unresolved. Existing studies lack comprehensive comparisons of LED, halogen, and plasma arc units through ceramic discs. The role of self-curing catalysts in these scenarios is not fully understood. This paper addresses these uncertainties by testing six different light sources and a self-curing option.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The aim was to evaluate how ceramic disc thickness affects the polymerization efficiency of various light sources. The specific problem is the reduced light transmission through ceramics, which may compromise the mechanical properties of luting agents. This study sought to determine if certain light sources or exposure modes could overcome these limitations. The motivation stems from clinical needs in ceramic restorations where optimal bonding is essential. The study also aimed to compare the effectiveness of a self-curing catalyst against light-curing alone. No prior work had tested these variables together in a standardized setup. The goal was to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians on optimal curing protocols. The study focused on depth of cure and microhardness as key performance indicators.

    Keywords:
    dental resin polymerizationlight curing unitsceramic disc effectsVickers microhardness

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The study found that ceramic thickness significantly reduces polymerization depth and hardness, with LED units generally performing better than halogen or plasma arc units.

    LuxOmax, e-Light (12 seconds), and Aurys (10 or 20 seconds) showed the most dramatic hardness reductions under 2-mm discs.

    The authors suggest that a self-curing catalyst produces equivalent or greater hardness and depth of cure than light-curing alone.

    Vickers microhardness was used to assess the mechanical properties of the polymerized resin at specific distances from the ceramic disc bottom.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    The study used ceramic discs of 1 mm and 2 mm thicknesses prepared according to ISO 4049 standards. Dual-cured resin composite was placed with and without a self-curing catalyst in steel molds. Six different light curing units were tested, including halogen, plasma arc, and LED sources with varying exposure times. Depth of cure was measured using standardized methods. Vickers microhardness was assessed at two distances from the disc bottom. Statistical analysis included medians and percentiles for each group. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare results across groups. The experimental setup ensured consistency in material application and curing conditions.

    Main Results:

    Ceramic disc thickness significantly reduced polymerization depth and microhardness across all tested light sources. The 2-mm discs produced lower hardness values than 1-mm discs for all units. LuxOmax, e-Light (12 seconds), and Aurys (10 or 20 seconds) showed the most dramatic hardness reductions. LED units generally outperformed halogen and plasma arc units in maintaining hardness. The self-curing catalyst produced equivalent or greater hardness than light-curing alone. No significant differences were observed between LED units with longer exposure times. Plasma arc units showed inconsistent performance under thicker discs. The results suggest that ceramic thickness and light source type interact to influence polymerization outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    The authors propose that ceramic thickness significantly affects polymerization efficiency. They suggest that LED units may offer better performance than halogen or plasma arc units. The study's findings support the use of a self-curing catalyst to enhance mechanical properties. The authors state that hardness decreases more dramatically with 2-mm discs than with 1-mm discs. They suggest that exposure time and light intensity are critical factors in overcoming ceramic interference. The results imply that clinicians should consider ceramic thickness when selecting a light source. The authors propose that longer exposure times may not always improve outcomes. The study concludes that polymerization efficiency varies by light source and ceramic thickness.

    Ceramic thickness had a negative effect on curing depth and hardness, with 2-mm discs showing more significant reductions than 1-mm discs.

    The authors used the Mann-Whitney U-test to compare medians and percentiles across groups.