Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
Surfactant Depletion Combined with Injurious Ventilation Results in a Reproducible Model of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Published on: April 7, 2021
Esophageal and transpulmonary pressures in acute respiratory failure
Daniel Talmor1, Todd Sarge, Carl R O'Donnell
1Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Objective:
Pressure inflating the lung during mechanical ventilation is the difference between pressure applied at the airway opening (Pao) and pleural pressure (Ppl). Depending on the chest wall's contribution to respiratory mechanics, a given positive end-expiratory and/or end-inspiratory plateau pressure may be appropriate for one patient but inadequate or potentially injurious for another. Thus, failure to account for chest wall mechanics may affect results in clinical trials of mechanical ventilation strategies in acute respiratory distress syndrome. By measuring esophageal pressure (Pes), we sought to characterize influence of the chest wall on Ppl and transpulmonary pressure (PL) in patients with acute respiratory failure.
Design:
Prospective observational study.
Setting:
Medical and surgical intensive care units at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Patients:
Seventy patients with acute respiratory failure.
Interventions:
Placement of esophageal balloon-catheters.
Measurements And Main Results:
Airway, esophageal, and gastric pressures recorded at end-exhalation and end-inflation Pes averaged 17.5 +/- 5.7 cm H2O at end-expiration and 21.2 +/- 7.7 cm H2O at end-inflation and were not significantly correlated with body mass index or chest wall elastance. Estimated PL was 1.5 +/- 6.3 cm H2O at end-expiration, 21.4 +/- 9.3 cm H2O at end-inflation, and 18.4 +/- 10.2 cm H2O (n = 40) during an end-inspiratory hold (plateau). Although PL at end-expiration was significantly correlated with positive end-expiratory pressure (p < .0001), only 24% of the variance in PL was explained by Pao (R = .243), and 52% was due to variation in Pes.
Conclusions:
In patients in acute respiratory failure, elevated esophageal pressures suggest that chest wall mechanical properties often contribute substantially and unpredictably to total respiratory impedance, and therefore Pao may not adequately predict PL or lung distention. Systematic use of esophageal manometry has the potential to improve ventilator management in acute respiratory failure by providing more direct assessment of lung distending pressure.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Pressure Relationships in Thoracic Cavity
Breathing Mechanisms
Both intra-alveolar and intrapleural pressures rely on specific lung properties. The ability to breathe—allowing air to enter the lungs during...
01:24Pulmonary Ventilation: Inhalation
Boyle's law becomes particularly pertinent when examining respiratory...
01:21Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...
01:21Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
01:30Acute Respiratory Failure-III
01:29Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...