Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Forage quality analyses and interpretation.

J G Linn1, N P Martin

  • 1Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.

The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice
|July 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy of recycled sand or organic solids as bedding sources for lactating cows housed in freestalls.

Journal of dairy science·2019
Same author

Initial results from the New Horizons exploration of 2014 MU<sub>69</sub>, a small Kuiper Belt object.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2019
Same author

Synthesis and structural characterization of the first neptunium based metal-organic frameworks incorporating {Np<sub>6</sub>O<sub>8</sub>} hexanuclear clusters.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2018
Same author

A 100-Year Review: Calf nutrition and management.

Journal of dairy science·2017
Same author

Invited review: Sustainable forage and grain crop production for the US dairy industry.

Journal of dairy science·2017
Same author

Rectus abdominis atrophy after ventral abdominal incisions: midline versus chevron.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2017

Accurate forage analysis, including dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP), is crucial for dairy cattle nutrition. Understanding variations from sampling and analysis methods ensures efficient forage utilization and optimal animal performance.

Area of Science:

  • Animal Nutrition
  • Agricultural Science
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Accurate forage analysis is essential for optimizing dairy cattle diets and performance.
  • Key nutritional components include dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), calcium (Ca), and phosphorus (P).
  • Variations in analytical results can stem from sampling, analysis methods, environmental factors, plant species, and harvest practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the essential analyses for determining forage quality and nutritive composition.
  • To emphasize the impact of sampling and analysis methods on the accuracy of forage evaluation.
  • To discuss the challenges nutritionists face in interpreting variations in forage analysis data.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of standard forage analysis techniques (DM, CP, ADF, NDF, Ca, P).
  • Discussion of factors influencing analytical accuracy and precision.
  • Introduction of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) as a potentially accurate and precise alternative if properly calibrated.

Main Results:

  • Improper sampling is a significant, often overlooked, source of analytical variation.
  • New techniques like NIRS can achieve accuracy comparable to conventional methods with proper calibration.
  • Distinguishing between analytical error, sampling error, and natural variation is a key challenge.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate determination and interpretation of forage composition are vital for efficient dairy cattle diet formulation.
  • Addressing variations in sampling and analysis is critical for reliable forage quality assessment.
  • Understanding the sources of variation is paramount for nutritionists to ensure optimal animal performance.