Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bayesian modeling of differential gene expression.

Alex Lewin1, Sylvia Richardson, Clare Marshall

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK. a.m.lewin@imperial.ac.uk

Biometrics
|March 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Borrowing from historical control data in a Bayesian time-to-event model with flexible baseline hazard function.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Ethnic differences in Long COVID diagnosed in primary care in England (2020-2022): an observational cohort study using OpenSAFELY.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2026
Same author

A Bayesian life-course linear structural equations model (BLSEM) to explore the development of body mass index (BMI) from the prenatal stage until middle age.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2025
Same author

Analytical approaches to evaluate risk factors of multimorbidity: a systematic scoping review protocol.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Genetic vulnerability and adverse mental health outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of CENTER-TBI and TRACK-TBI cohorts.

EClinicalMedicine·2024
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian phase I/II platform design with data augmentation accounting for delayed outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a Bayesian hierarchical model for identifying differentially expressed genes. The model improves accuracy by simultaneously estimating array effects and differential expression, reducing false positives and aiding gene list selection.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Accurate detection of differentially expressed genes is crucial for biological research.
  • Traditional methods may not adequately account for technical variations like array effects.
  • Normalization and differential expression analysis are often performed separately, potentially impacting results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a Bayesian hierarchical model for simultaneous estimation of gene expression and array effects.
  • To provide a robust method for selecting biologically relevant gene lists for further investigation.
  • To improve the accuracy of differential expression analysis by integrating normalization within the model.

Main Methods:

  • A Bayesian hierarchical model incorporating gene-specific variances and hierarchical shrinkage.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simultaneous estimation of array effects and differential gene expression.
  • Exploration of nonlinear functions for expression-level dependent array effect modeling.
  • Posterior predictive checks for model criticism.
  • A novel approach to gene list selection using combined criteria and posterior distributions.

    • Main Results:

    • Simultaneous modeling of array effects and differential expression significantly reduces false positive rates.
    • Empirical evidence supports the necessity of expression-level dependent array effects.
    • The proposed gene selection method effectively incorporates parameter uncertainty.
    • Application to mouse knockout data yielded biologically consistent Gene Ontology annotations.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed Bayesian model offers a more accurate and reliable approach to differential gene expression analysis.
    • Integrating normalization within the model enhances the robustness of results.
    • The proposed gene selection strategy provides a principled way to prioritize genes for downstream validation.
    • This methodology has significant implications for high-throughput gene expression studies.