Recombinant activated protein C: the key is clinical assessment of risk of death, not subset analysis

R Phillip Dellinger1

  • 1Section of Critical Care Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, One Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ 08103, USA. dellinger-phil@cooperhealth.edu

Insights

The PROWESS trial showed recombinant activated protein C (rhAPC) reduced severe sepsis mortality by 6.1%. Despite initial findings, ongoing debate surrounds rhAPC

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Severe sepsis poses a significant mortality risk.
  • Recombinant activated protein C (rhAPC) emerged as a potential therapeutic agent.
  • The PROWESS trial provided initial evidence for rhAPC efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical utility of rhAPC in severe sepsis.
  • To address criticisms and controversies surrounding the PROWESS trial.
  • To guide clinical practice regarding rhAPC use.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the PROWESS trial data.
  • Review of subsequent studies on rhAPC.
  • Synthesis of evidence to inform clinical decision-making.

Main Results:

  • The PROWESS trial reported a 6.1% absolute mortality reduction (p=0.005).
  • Subsequent research has generated both supporting and conflicting data.
  • Controversy persists regarding study design, analysis, and interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • The clinical application of rhAPC remains a subject of debate.
  • Evidence synthesis is crucial for navigating rhAPC use in clinical practice.
  • Further research may be needed to clarify rhAPC's role in severe sepsis management.

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers01:19

Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers

Cardiac biomarkers are critical in diagnosing, prognosing, and managing cardiovascular diseases. Routine measurement of specific biomarkers such as B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and homocysteine (Hcy) is common practice in clinical settings to evaluate heart function and predict cardiovascular events.
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT01:25

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...