Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
Score averaging for alien species risk assessment: a probabilistic alternative
1Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK. j.holt@gre.ac.uk
Abstract:
In many biological risk assessment problems and specifically those involving invasive alien species and quarantine pests, ordinal scoring systems are used as a basis for risk quantification. Frequently, the problem is disaggregated into a series of components to allow a more structured and systematic evaluation. Each component is then scored and an overall measure of risk calculated from the set of scores. No satisfactory method exists to compute an overall measure of risk and most practitioners have resorted to score-averaging. Here we describe an approach involving the linear mapping of scores to notional probabilities to allow the use of conditional probability to derive an overall measure. Initial results give better discrimination between high and low risk cases and closer correspondence with independent expert judgement than does score-averaging.
More Related Videos
08:14Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
Published on: April 28, 2023
10:55Enhancing an Avian Sound Recognition Model's Detection Precision via Logistic Regression of Large Acoustic Datasets: A Case Study of the European Robin (Erithacus rubecula)
Published on: April 11, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Unusual Results
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value = μ + 2σ
Minimum unusual value...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk