Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Electrophysiological Measurement of Noxious-evoked Brain Activity in Neonates Using a Flat-tip Probe Coupled to Electroencephalography
Published on: November 29, 2017
CAM for pediatric pain: what is state-of-the-research?
Insights
This review examines complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for pediatric pain, focusing on modalities with controlled trials. Limited research exists, highlighting ethical and methodological challenges for future studies on CAM efficacy in children.
Area of Science:
- Integrative medicine and pain management research.
- Pediatric healthcare and evidence-based practice.
Background:
- Previous review of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for pediatric pain published in 2005.
- Focus on CAM modalities with at least one controlled trial or multiple baseline studies.
- Inclusion criteria limited to studies with pediatric participants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence for the efficacy of CAM approaches for pediatric pain.
- To identify limitations in the existing literature and discuss reasons for these gaps.
- To propose directions for future research in pediatric pain management using CAM.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of controlled trials and multiple baseline studies.
- Inclusion of studies specifically involving pediatric populations.
- Application of American Psychological Association Division 12 Task Force criteria for evidence evaluation.
Main Results:
- Several CAM modalities were excluded due to insufficient controlled trial data.
- The existing literature on CAM for pediatric pain is limited.
- Ethical and other reasons contribute to the scarcity of research.
Conclusions:
- Significant gaps exist in the evidence base for CAM efficacy in pediatric pain.
- Ethical considerations and methodological challenges impede research progress.
- Future studies are needed to rigorously evaluate CAM interventions for children's pain.
Abstract:
Previously, we reviewed the evidence for the efficacy of CAM approaches for pediatric pain (volume 2; issue 2; 2005) using criteria developed by the American Psychological Association Division 12 Task Force. Our review focused on CAM modalities that had been tested with at least one controlled trial or multiple baseline study. In addition, only those trials in which children comprised the study sample were included. Thus, several CAM modalities were not included in our review. Key ethical and other reasons for the limited literature on CAM for pediatric pain as well as directions for future studies are discussed.
