Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
Longitudinal reference ranges for estimated fetal weight
Synnøve Lian Johnsen1, Svein Rasmussen, Tom Wilsgaard
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. synnove.johnsen@helse-bergen.no
Objective:
The aims of the present study were to establish reference ranges for the growth of estimated fetal weight (EFW) between gestational weeks 20 and 42 and to determine the effect of fetal and maternal factors.
Methods:
This prospective longitudinal study was based on 634 low-risk pregnancies and a total of 1799 examinations. Gestational age was computed from last menstrual period. Head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length were measured using ultrasound, and EFW was calculated using the formula of Combs et al. The statistical analysis was based on regression analysis and multilevel modeling.
Results:
Intrauterine growth expressed by EFW showed a continuous pattern until term. Males were calculated to be 5% heavier than female fetuses at 20 gestational weeks and 3% at 40 weeks. Otherwise, the fetal and maternal effects on intrauterine growth correspond to a weight shift of 1.3% for breech/nonbreech, 2.5% for each increase in maternal height tertile, and -4% for smoking/nonsmoking. Maternal age higher than 34 years had a significant increased EFW of 4.5% compared with maternal age less than 24 years. Cephalic index in the third tertile had a 1.1% lower EFW compared with the first tertile. Maternal weight, body mass index, and parity did not influence the EFW. Terms for customization to individualize the growth patterns are presented.
Conclusions:
The present growth chart is recommended as robust reference ranges for assessing EFW and growth. Fetal and maternal variables can be added into the models to individualize the prediction of EFW.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Midrange
Simply put, the midrange is half of the data set’s range. Similar to the mean, the midrange is sensitive to the extreme values and hence the prospective outliers. However, unlike the mean, the midrange is not sensitive to all the values of the data set that lie in the middle. Thus, it is prone to outliers and...
Range
15.9; 16.1; 15.2; 14.8; 15.8; 15.9; 16.0; 15.5
Measurements of the amount of soda in a 16-ounce can vary since different subjects record these measurements or since the exact amount - 16 ounces of liquid, was not...
What are Estimates?
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such as the mean,...
