Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Fundamental global model for the structures and energetics of nanocrystalline ionic solids
Elena Bichoutskaia1, Nicholas C Pyper
1University Chemical Laboratory, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
Abstract:
This paper presents a general theory elucidating the relationships between the structures and cohesive energetics of alkali halide nanocrystals consisting of small sections of bulk rocksalt structures with m(1) and m(2) rows but infinite along the z axis. The theory introduces the electrostatic interactions between the ions treated as point charges and the short-range repulsions between the closest ion neighbors with the latter terms written in the Born form Ar(-)(n). Minimum energy structures are defined by the distances a(e) and b(e) separating the closest ions perpendicular and parallel to the z direction. The ratio a(e)/b(e), defining the crystal shape, is independent of the strength A of the short-range repulsion, greater than the bulk value of unity, and increases with decrease of the crystal cross section or n. This ratio tends toward unity in the hard sphere limit of infinite n. Both b(e)/R(6:6)(e) and a(e)/R(6:6)(e), with the bulk separation R(6:6)(e), are less than one, increase with increase of the crystal cross section or n, and are independent of A if this is independent of structure. The structural dependence of A increases its value with a decreasing crystal cross section rendering closer to unity the ratios a(e)/b(e), b(e)/R(6:6)(e), and a(e)/R(6:6)(e). Energy gains on relaxing the crystal toward equilibrium from its bulk separations decrease with increase of the crystal cross section or n, being about 60 kJ/mol for a one-dimensional chain with n = 6 but 0.5 kJ/mol for m(1) = m(2) = 4 with n = 12. The energy gained on relaxing to a structure with a(e)/b(e) constrained at unity is about 10 times greater than the further energy gains consequent on removing this constraint. The present theory neglecting the interaction between ions and the encapsulating nanotube explains the experimentally measured b(e)/R(6:6)(e) ratios. The observation that the a(e)/R(6:6)(e) values are greater than one shows that ion-wall interactions are important in determining the values of a(e).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Structures of Solids
Molecular and Ionic Solids
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...
Lattice Energies of Ionic Crystals
Ionic Crystal Structures
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
Metallic Solids
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability. Many...
Unit Cells

