Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variability in mesothelioma tumor response classification.

Samuel G Armato1, Joseph L Ogarek, Adam Starkey

  • 1Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637, USA. s-armato@uchicago.edu

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|March 24, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Simvastatin Treatment in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: a Phase II Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial Shows Reduction in IL-6 Levels.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Developing a pan cancer therapy based on DISE-inducing short RNAs.

Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids·2026
Same author

SLFN5 restrains type I interferon responses and promotes glioblastoma via its N-terminal Schlafen core domain.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Genome-wide variation in cell-free DNA end-motif entropy predicts immunotherapy response in head and neck cancer.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same author

Multi-omics analysis reveals LARP1 as a key integrator of translation and metabolism in AML.

Oncogenesis·2026
Same author

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2026 Expert Consensus on the Multimodal Treatment of Pleural Mesothelioma.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

The Banality of Cancer: Entropy As a Third Pillar of Lung Nodule Risk Assessment.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

A Narrow Window for Artificial Intelligence-Generated Synthetic Temporal Bone CT From MRI.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

From Uncertainty to Actionable Management: The Isolated Abnormal Axillary Lymph Node.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Beyond Detection: Translating Artificial Intelligence-Driven Opportunistic Screening Into Clinical Action.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Navigating PSMA PET Radiopharmaceuticals: Clinical and Operational Factors.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

From Mesenteric Ischemia to Intestinal Stroke.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
See all related articles

Observer variability in mesothelioma tumor thickness measurement on CT scans impacts tumor response classification. A semiautomated method showed potential for consistent tumor response assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging Analysis

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of mesothelioma tumor thickness is crucial for assessing treatment response.
  • Observer variability in manual measurements can affect tumor response classification.
  • Evaluating novel measurement techniques is important for improving diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess observer variability in measuring mesothelioma tumor thickness changes on CT scans.
  • To evaluate the impact of different measurement approaches on tumor response classification.
  • To determine the performance of a semiautomated measurement method.

Main Methods:

  • Four observers measured mesothelioma tumor thickness on serial CT scans of 22 patients.
  • Measurements were performed using baseline scan data presented via written reports or superimposed images.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A semiautomated method was also used for comparison.
  • Variability and concordance in tumor response classification were analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • A slight increase in tumor response classification concordance was observed with the visual approach (84.8%) versus the written-report approach (82.6%).
    • Statistically significant differences in actual measurements were found between the visual and written-report methods (p = 0.03).
    • Semiautomated measurements demonstrated consistency with manual measurements.

    Conclusions:

    • The method of presenting baseline tumor measurements influences follow-up measurements and potentially tumor response classification.
    • Semiautomated tumor thickness measurement shows promise for consistent tumor response assessment in mesothelioma.
    • Standardizing measurement protocols is essential for reliable interpretation of CT scans.