Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Involuntary attention and identification accuracy.

William Prinzmetal1, Sam Park, Rosalie Garrett

  • 1Psychology Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1650, USA. wprinz@socrates.berkeley.edu

Perception & Psychophysics
|March 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimizing Daily Surgical Scheduling Improves Operative Time Consumption: A Retrospective Study.

Arthroplasty today·2026
Same author

Measuring the Bandgap of Ambipolar 2D Semiconductors using Multilayer Graphene Contact.

Small science·2025
Same author

Osseous tumors of the foot, ankle, and lower leg: a cross-sectional observational study analysing 288 cases.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2024
Same author

Soft tissue tumors of the lower leg, foot and ankle: A cross-sectional observational study analysing 376 cases.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2024
Same author

Ultrafast van der Waals diode using graphene quantum capacitance and Fermi-level depinning.

Science advances·2023
Same author

5 nm Ultrathin Crystalline Ferroelectric P(VDF-TrFE)-Brush Tuned for Hysteresis-Free Sub 60 mV dec<sup>-1</sup>  Negative-Capacitance Transistors.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2023
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

This study reevaluates claims that noninformative spatial cues influence attention. Findings suggest observed effects were due to eye movements or task confounds, not involuntary attention.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The spatial cuing paradigm distinguishes voluntary and involuntary attention.
  • Prinzmetal et al. (2005) proposed noninformative cues do not affect accuracy.
  • This study examines conflicting findings regarding noninformative cue effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reevaluate reports suggesting noninformative spatial cues impact accuracy.
  • To determine if observed effects are due to covert attention or other factors.
  • To clarify the mechanisms underlying voluntary and involuntary attention.

Main Methods:

  • Reanalysis of two studies (Dufour, 1999; Klein & Dick, 2002).
  • Investigation of spatial cuing paradigms with noninformative auditory and visual cues.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of tasks including conjunction search and rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP).

    • Main Results:

    • Dufour's (1999) results attributed to overt orienting (eye movements), not covert attention.
    • Klein and Dick's (2002) findings explained by location uncertainty or stimulus order confounds.
    • Evidence does not support noninformative spatial cues directly affecting accuracy via involuntary attention.

    Conclusions:

    • Noninformative spatial cues do not appear to directly modulate accuracy in attention tasks.
    • Overt orienting and methodological confounds can explain previous positive findings.
    • The distinction between voluntary and involuntary attention mechanisms remains supported.