Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Introduction to the EU REACH legislation.

Christina Grindon1, Robert Combes

  • 1Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments, 96-98 North Sherwood Street, Nottingham NG1 4EE, UK. Christina@frame.org.uk

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals : ATLA
|March 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary

FRAME

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phase 0, including microdosing approaches: Applying the Three Rs and increasing the efficiency of human drug development.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2019
Same author

No time like the present - two hundred years of Parkinson's disease.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2017
Same author

Animal experimentation and alternatives: revealed preferences.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2017
Same author

Animal experimentation: the statistics speak for themselves.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2017
Same author

An approach to minimise dog use in regulatory toxicology: production of a best practice guide to study design.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2013
Same author

In vitro models of inhalation toxicity and disease. The report of a FRAME workshop.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2009

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology and Chemical Safety
  • Regulatory Science
  • Animal Welfare Science

Background:

  • The European Union's Registration, Evaluation, and Authorisation of Chemicals (REACH) system was proposed in 2001.
  • Concerns regarding scientific validity and animal welfare were raised concerning the initial REACH proposals.
  • FRAME has been actively involved in addressing these concerns within the REACH framework.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarise FRAME's initiatives concerning the EU REACH system.
  • To highlight the scientific and animal welfare issues addressed by FRAME.
  • To document FRAME's suggestions for improving the REACH legislation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of FRAME's past and present initiatives related to REACH.
  • Analysis of scientific and animal welfare considerations within REACH proposals.
  • Documentation of FRAME's recommendations and their impact on REACH legislation.

Main Results:

  • FRAME's initiatives focused on enhancing the scientific robustness of chemical safety testing.
  • Significant attention was given to reducing and replacing animal testing in chemical assessments.
  • Many of FRAME's suggestions appear to have been incorporated into the evolving REACH legislation.

Conclusions:

  • FRAME's engagement has positively influenced the development of the REACH system.
  • The initiatives have contributed to a more scientifically sound and animal-welfare-conscious regulatory framework.
  • Ongoing dialogue and scientific input are crucial for effective chemical safety legislation.

Related Experiment Videos