Related Experiment Videos
Ethical issues in artificial nutrition and hydration.
1Office of Clinical Ethics, Baylor Health Care System; Director, Palliative Care Consultation Service, Baylor University Medical Center, 3434 Swiss Avenue, Suite 205, Dallas, TX 75204, USA. robertf@baylorhealth.edu
Summary
Clinical nutritionists must navigate the complex ethical decisions surrounding artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH). This review explores medical ethics and its intersection with ANH, including guidance for practitioners.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Clinical Nutrition
- Bioethics
Background:
- Medical ethics has complemented medical science for millennia.
- Clinical nutrition support practitioners face ethical dilemmas, particularly regarding artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH).
- Decisions on ANH involve technical and moral considerations.
Purpose of the Study:
- Familiarize clinical nutritionists with medical ethics.
- Clarify the relationship between medical ethics, science, politics, and law.
- Analyze ethical aspects of initiating, withholding, or withdrawing ANH.
Main Methods:
- Literature review on medical ethics.
- Analysis of ethical decision-making in clinical nutrition.
- Examination of pronouncements on ANH for vegetative patients.
Main Results:
- Medical ethics is crucial for all healthcare professionals, including nutritionists.
- Decisions regarding ANH are complex, requiring both scientific and moral deliberation.
- Guidance from ethical bodies and religious leaders informs ANH decisions.
Conclusions:
- Clinical nutritionists play a vital role in the ethical discourse surrounding ANH.
- Understanding medical ethics is essential for providing comprehensive patient care.
- Ethical frameworks and specific guidance aid in complex ANH decisions.