Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces.

Lichan Liu1, Andreas A Ioannides

  • 1Laboratory for Human Brain Dynamics, RIKEN Brain Science Institute (BSI), 2-1 Hirosawa, Wakoshi, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan.

Neuroimage
|March 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cerebellar Micro Complex Model Using Histologic Boolean Mapping Simulates Adaptive Motor Control.

Neuroinformatics·2025
Same author

Using spectral continuity to extract breathing rate from heart rate and its applications in sleep physiology.

Frontiers in physiology·2024
Same author

An Unexplained Cause of Oxygen Desaturation Following Heterotopic Tricuspid Valve Replacement.

JACC. Cardiovascular interventions·2024
Same author

Changes in distinct brain systems identified with fMRI during smoking cessation treatment with varenicline: a review.

Psychopharmacology·2024
Same author

First activity and interactions in thalamus and cortex using raw single-trial EEG and MEG elicited by somatosensory stimulation.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2024
Same author

Rhythmicity in heart rate and its surges usher a special period of sleep, a likely home for PGO waves.

Current research in physiology·2022
Same journal

Lifespan Trajectories of the Brain's Functional Complexity Characterized by Multiscale Sample Entropy.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Pleasant fragrance modulates dyadic social sharing of positive emotion: Sharer-centered socioemotional enhancement effect and its neural couplings.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Altered Functional Hierarchical and Sequential Organization in Individuals with Schizophrenia during Auditory Processing.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Mechanical Deformation Explains Distinct Neuroimaging Patterns and Etiologies in Brain Trauma.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Ventral striatum temporal interference brain stimulation enhances the reward-positivity event-related potential and reduces anxiety.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

NeuroHarm‑Kit: An Open‑Source Toolbox for Benchmarking Deep‑Learning Harmonization of Multi‑Site T1‑Weighted MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Facial emotion processing varies by visual field location. Peripheral faces activate early visual areas (V1/V2) and the fusiform gyrus faster than central faces, revealing distinct spatiotemporal dynamics.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Traditional neuroimaging studies often use centrally presented faces, limiting understanding of visual field influences on face processing.
  • Widespread activation in striate and extrastriate areas complicates the study of spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the presentation location (central vs. peripheral) of facial stimuli affects magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses.
  • To test the hypothesis that visual processing of emotional faces depends on their location within the visual field.

Main Methods:

  • Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to record human brain activity.
  • Tomographic and statistical parametric mapping analyses identified activated occipitotemporal areas.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Mutual information analysis assessed functional connectivity between visual areas.

    • Main Results:

    • V1/V2 activity was stronger for lower visual field presentation; fusiform activity was stronger for central presentation.
    • Both V1/V2 and fusiform areas showed earlier activation for peripheral compared to central face presentation.
    • Peripheral stimulation led to earlier and stronger contralateral V1/V2 and fusiform activation. Connectivity patterns varied with visual field location.

    Conclusions:

    • Face stimuli are primarily processed in the contralateral hemisphere.
    • Early fusiform activation preceding V1/V2 activation was observed for upper visual field stimulation, challenging previous models.