Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery In Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-Center Experience in China
Published on: February 11, 2022
Equivalent arrhythmic risk in patients recently diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy compared with patients
Kevin J Makati1, Airley E Fish, Hannah H England
1Tufts University School of Medicine/New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA. mlink@tufts-nemc.org
Insights
The 9-month diagnosis duration for nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy does not predict arrhythmic risk for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Patients with recent or late diagnoses show similar rates of potentially lethal arrhythmias.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) expanded implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) coverage for nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with a 9-month diagnosis duration criterion.
- This study investigates the impact of this 9-month criterion on arrhythmic risk in patients with nonischemic DCM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and compare the arrhythmic risk in patients with nonischemic DCM based on recent (<9 months) versus late (≥9 months) diagnosis.
- To evaluate the efficacy of the 9-month diagnostic duration as a predictor of sudden cardiac death risk in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of an ICD registry from Tufts-New England Medical Center.
- Division of 131 nonischemic DCM patients into two cohorts: recent (<9 months) and late (≥9 months) diagnosis.
- Assessment of treated ventricular arrhythmias, potentially lethal arrhythmias (ventricular flutter ≥230 bpm), and ventricular fibrillation.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (P = .49) between recent and late diagnosis groups.
- No significant difference in the occurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (P = .16) between the two cohorts.
- Mean ejection fraction was 20.6% ± 8%, with a follow-up of 25.3 ± 24 months.
Conclusions:
- Diagnosis duration of nonischemic DCM does not appear to reliably differentiate arrhythmic risk.
- The 9-month time qualifier in CMS guidelines may not be optimal for identifying high-risk patients for ICD implantation.
- Findings suggest current CMS criteria may not accurately stratify sudden cardiac death risk in this specific nonischemic DCM cohort.
Background:
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently expanded coverage for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35% and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy for > or =9 months. To investigate the ramifications of these criteria, the ICD registry from Tufts-New England Medical Center was analyzed for arrhythmic events and death in patients with newly diagnosed (<9 months) vs late-diagnosed (> or =9 months) nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to analyze the arrhythmic risk in patients with recent vs late diagnosis of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Methods:
One hundred thirty-one patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy were divided into two cohorts (<9 or > or =9 months of symptoms) and analyzed for any occurrence of treated ventricular arrhythmia, potentially lethal arrhythmias defined as ventricular flutter rates > or =230 bpm, and ventricular fibrillation. Patients with documented sustained ventricular tachycardias (included in prior CMS coverage) were excluded.
Results:
In the study group, the mean age was 58.1 +/- 15 years and ejection fraction 20.6% +/- 8%. In a follow-up period of 25.3 +/- 24 months, the 52 patients with a recent diagnosis (1.4 +/- 2 months) had no difference in the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (P = .49) and malignant ventricular arrhythmias (P = .16) compared with the 79 patients diagnosed > or =9 months (mean 58.1 +/- 39 months).
Conclusion:
Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy experienced equivalent occurrences of treated and potentially lethal arrhythmias irrespective of diagnosis duration. These findings suggest that the 9-month time qualifier used in the CMS guidelines for ICD reimbursement may not reliably discriminate patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death in this selected population.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
