Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detecting emergent effects of multiple predator species.

Blaine D Griffen1

  • 1Zoology Department, University of New Hampshire, 46 College Road, Durham, NH 03824, USA. bgriffen@cisunix.unh.edu

Oecologia
|March 29, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the consequences of collapsing introductions and range expansions under a single framework: A Comment on 'The concept of biological invasions in the Anthropocene: introductions and range expansions' (2026), by Carlton and Schwindt.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Similar Metabolic Costs for Mangrove Tree Crabs (<i>Aratus pisonii</i>) in Historic and Range-Shifted Habitats.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Tissue-specific energetics of the invasive Asian shore crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus throughout its range and through time.

Oecologia·2025
Same author

Effect of Food Mass in the Gut on the Metabolic Rate of <i>Carcinus maenas</i> in the Field.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Metabolic rates of different demographics in the sand fiddler crab Leptuca pugilator.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Data needs for sea otter bioenergetics modeling.

Conservation physiology·2024
Same journal

Unveiling the microhabitat puzzle: how spatial heterogeneity shapes cave invertebrate biodiversity across scales.

Oecologia·2026
Same journal

Soil microbial drought history affects physiological response of select tree species to drought stress.

Oecologia·2026
Same journal

Unveiling the effects of interspecific competition: ecological consequences of competitive release after damming on Salvelinus curilus populations in a three-salmonid species coexistence system.

Oecologia·2026
Same journal

Orchid bee diversity responds positively to forest cover and landscape heterogeneity in the Brazilian Savanna.

Oecologia·2026
Same journal

The impact of native vertebrates on enemy release and plant functional traits during community assembly.

Oecologia·2026
Same journal

Nutrient fluctuations alter effects of litter diversity of invasive species on native communities.

Oecologia·2026
See all related articles

Understanding combined predator effects is crucial. Two common experimental designs yield conflicting results, highlighting the need for integrated approaches to study predator-prey dynamics accurately.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Predator-Prey Dynamics

Background:

  • Multiple predator species interacting with shared prey can lead to unpredictable mortality patterns.
  • Accurate assessment of combined predator effects is essential for ecological modeling and management.
  • Current experimental designs, additive and substitutive, are used to study these interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of additive and substitutive experimental designs when examining combined predation.
  • To determine if these designs yield consistent conclusions regarding predator species interactions.
  • To propose an improved experimental framework for assessing multi-predator impacts.

Main Methods:

  • Simultaneously employed both additive and substitutive experimental designs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigated predation by two crab species on a shared mussel prey population.
  • Analyzed the quantitative and qualitative differences in results between the two designs.

    • Main Results:

    • The additive and substitutive designs produced quantitatively and qualitatively divergent results.
    • The discrepancies led to fundamentally different conclusions about how predator species combine their effects.
    • The choice of experimental design significantly influenced the interpretation of predator interactions.

    Conclusions:

    • Additive and substitutive designs address complementary, but not interchangeable, ecological questions.
    • Neither design alone provides a complete understanding of combined predator effects.
    • An integrated experimental approach combining both designs is recommended for a comprehensive assessment of multi-predator impacts.