Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Characterizing aggressive behavior in a forensic population.

Tim R Kockler1, Matthew S Stanford, Chad E Nelson

  • 1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, USA. tk4nsic@yahoo.com

The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
|March 30, 2006
PubMed
Summary

This study validates the Impulsive/Premeditated Aggression Scale (IPAS) in a forensic setting. Findings support a bimodal model of aggression, distinguishing between impulsive and premeditated behaviors for better assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Tree of Life Synagogue Attack: A Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol-18 Examination of Pre-Attack Warnings and Post-Attack Contagion and Copycat Effects.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same author

Extremism, Terrorism, and Mental Disorder.

Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)·2026
Same author

The Clinical Risk Management of Stalking: "Someone Is Watching Over Me..."

Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)·2026
Same author

The health-esteem model of motivation for exercise goals: A preliminary study.

Health psychology open·2026
Same author

The ARCH model: a neuroevolutionary framework for behavioral execution.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025
Same author

Affective and predatory violence: from evolutionary adaptation to psychiatric morbidity.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • The dichotomy between continuous and dichotomous models of aggression is a persistent debate in psychological research.
  • Existing research lacks a validated instrument to reliably differentiate between impulsive and premeditated aggression, particularly in forensic populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the Impulsive/Premeditated Aggression Scale (IPAS) in a forensic sample.
  • To determine if the IPAS effectively distinguishes between impulsive and premeditated aggression in this population.
  • To provide empirical support for a bimodal classification of aggression.

Main Methods:

  • A 30-item self-report questionnaire, the Impulsive/Premeditated Aggression Scale (IPAS), was administered to a convenience sample of 85 individuals from a forensic state hospital.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Principal-components analysis was employed to analyze the factor structure of the IPAS items.

    • Main Results:

    • Principal-components analysis identified two distinct factors: Impulsive Aggression and Premeditated Aggression.
    • These two factors collectively explained 33% of the variance in aggressive behavior within the sample.
    • The findings demonstrated the IPAS's utility in a forensic context.

    Conclusions:

    • The study provides further validation for a bimodal model of aggression, differentiating between impulsive and premeditated types.
    • The results suggest the IPAS is a valuable tool for assessing aggression in forensic populations.
    • Implications for clinical assessment, diagnostic practices, and treatment strategies for aggressive behaviors are discussed.