Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The 'mini'-implant has arrived.

Gordon J Christensen1

  • 1Clinical Research Associates, Provo, Utah 84604, USA.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)
|March 31, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Smaller-diameter mini-implants offer a successful alternative to standard dental implants, expanding treatment options for more patients. These mini-implants reduce costs, pain, and trauma, though further research is recommended.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Observations on Current Controversies in Dentistry.

Dentistry today·2015
Same author

Rapid change in the fabrication of crowns and fixed prostheses.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2014
Same author

A legacy of leading and serving the profession. Interview by Damon Adams.

Dentistry today·2014
Same author

Use of luting or bonding with lithium disilicate and zirconia crowns.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2014
Same author

Author's response.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2014
Same author

Is the rush to all-ceramic crowns justified?

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2014

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Oral Surgery
  • Biomaterials

Background:

  • Dental implants represent a significant advancement in restorative dentistry.
  • Standard implants (approx. 3.75 mm diameter) often require bone grafting, limiting patient eligibility.
  • Bone grafting increases treatment complexity, cost, and patient discomfort.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and benefits of smaller-diameter mini-implants.
  • To determine if mini-implants can overcome limitations associated with standard implants.
  • To assess the impact of mini-implants on patient accessibility and treatment outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical data and outcomes for patients treated with mini-implants.
  • Comparison of treatment protocols and results between standard and mini-implants.
  • Analysis of patient demographics and suitability for different implant types.

Main Results:

  • Mini-implants have enabled successful implant placement in cases previously unsuitable for standard implants.
  • Use of mini-implants has led to reduced treatment costs, pain, and trauma for patients.
  • A broader patient population can now benefit from dental implant therapy.

Conclusions:

  • Mini-implants are a valuable and effective alternative to standard dental implants.
  • Smaller-diameter implants expand treatment possibilities and improve patient care.
  • Continued research is necessary to further validate the long-term success of mini-implants.

Related Experiment Videos