Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The qualitative research interview.

Barbara Dicicco-Bloom1, Benjamin F Crabtree

  • 1Department of Family Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Somerset, New Jersey 08873, USA. diciccba@umdnj.edu

Medical Education
|April 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using co-design to develop actionable strategies to identify and follow-up on breast cancer survivors in primary care.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

How they are making it work: Behavioral health consultant perspectives on the integration of behavioral health into primary care.

Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare·2026
Same author

Challenges of Care Transition From Hospital to Home for Older Colorectal Surgery Patients: Surgeons' Perspectives.

Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches·2026
Same author

Optimization of care and recovery in older colorectal cancer surgery patients: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot study protocol.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2026
Same author

"I had to work it out for myself": opportunities for primary care to fill a void for early-onset breast cancer survivors.

Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice·2026
Same author

A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study of a Youth-Led Digital Hypertension Education Intervention Among Parent-Youth Dyads.

Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education·2026
Same journal

When I say … 'in situ simulation'.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Examiner training and calibration for simulated clinical examinations: A scoping review.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When systems set the limits of supervision.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

From psychometrics to partnerships: Broadening what counts as validity evidence.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When I say the clinical digital divide.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Urology education under fire: Quantitative benchmarking of trainer adaptation and competency preservation in wartime Sudan.

Medical education·2026
See all related articles

Qualitative interviews gather in-depth insights by treating participants as active meaning-makers. This article explores less-structured interview methods, focusing on individual in-depth interviews and ethical considerations for participant protection.

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Qualitative Research Methods

Background:

  • Interviews are common qualitative data collection tools with diverse origins.
  • Less-structured approaches engage participants as active meaning-makers, unlike structured surveys.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review common qualitative interview methods.
  • To focus on the individual face-to-face in-depth interview.
  • To discuss in-depth interview methods and ethical considerations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of qualitative interviewing strategies.
  • Focus on in-depth, face-to-face interviews.
  • Discussion of ethical issues and participant rights.

Main Results:

  • Qualitative interviews offer rich insights into individual experiences.

Related Experiment Videos

  • In-depth interviews facilitate understanding of participant perspectives.
  • Ethical conduct is crucial for protecting interview participants.

    • Conclusions:

    • Less-structured qualitative interviews are valuable for deep understanding.
    • In-depth interviews require careful methodology and ethical oversight.
    • Participant rights and protection are paramount in qualitative research.