Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Cost effectiveness of a smoking cessation program in patients admitted for coronary heart disease
Petter Quist-Paulsen1, Stian Lydersen, Per S Bakke
1Department of Internal Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway. petterqp@online.no
Insights
Smoking cessation programs are highly cost-effective for coronary heart disease patients. A nurse-led intervention offers significant life years gained at a low cost compared to other cardiovascular treatments.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Public Health
- Health Economics
Background:
- Smoking cessation is crucial for reducing mortality post-coronary event.
- Smoking cessation programs are underutilized in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients due to cost concerns.
- This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in CHD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a smoking cessation program.
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation with other cardiovascular treatments.
- To assess the economic value of smoking cessation interventions for patients with coronary heart disease.
Main Methods:
- Cost-effectiveness analysis based on a randomized smoking cessation trial in CHD patients.
- Calculated cost per life year gained, considering program resources and patient outcomes.
- Estimated cost-effectiveness in low-risk (stable CHD) and high-risk (post-MI, unstable angina) groups using survival data and modeling.
Main Results:
- Lifetime cost per year of life gained was €280 (low-risk) and €110 (high-risk) (2000 prices).
- These costs are significantly lower than statins and ACE inhibitors, approximately 1/25th the cost.
- Sensitivity analysis confirmed low costs across various assumptions.
Conclusions:
- A nurse-led, multi-month smoking cessation program is highly cost-effective for CHD patients.
- This intervention provides a favorable economic comparison to other cardiovascular treatment modalities.
- Smoking cessation programs represent a valuable and affordable strategy in cardiovascular medicine.
Background:
Smoking cessation is probably the most important action to reduce mortality after a coronary event. Smoking cessation programs are not widely implemented in patients with coronary heart disease, however, possibly because they are thought not to be worth their costs. Our objectives were to estimate the cost effectiveness of a smoking cessation program, and to compare it with other treatment modalities in cardiovascular medicine.
Methods:
A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the basis of a recently conducted randomized smoking cessation intervention trial in patients admitted for coronary heart disease. The cost per life year gained by the smoking cessation program was derived from the resources necessary to implement the program, the number needed to treat to get one additional quitter from the program, and the years of life gained if quitting smoking. The cost effectiveness was estimated in a low-risk group (i.e. patients with stable coronary heart disease) and a high-risk group (i.e. patients after myocardial infarction or unstable angina), using survival data from previously published investigations, and with life-time extrapolation of the survival curves by survival function modeling.
Results:
In a lifetime perspective, the incremental cost per year of life gained by the smoking cessation program was euro 280 and euro 110 in the low and high-risk group, respectively (2000 prices). These costs compare favorably to other treatment modalities in patients with coronary heart disease, being approximately 1/25 the cost of both statins in the low-risk group and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the high-risk group. In a sensitivity analysis, the costs remained low in a wide range of assumptions.
Conclusions:
A nurse-led smoking cessation program with several months of intervention is very cost-effective compared with other treatment modalities in patients with coronary heart disease.
More Related Videos
06:39Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
Published on: August 28, 2017
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care