Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Control and relation: two foundational values and their consequences.

Anthony L Suchman1

  • 1The University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York, USA.

Journal of Interprofessional Care
|April 4, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Working Interdependently: How Individuals Constitute Effective Systems.

Journal of general internal medicine·2023
Same author

Intervening to enhance collaboration in translational research: A relational coordination approach.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2019
Same author

Preparing to lead change: An innovative curriculum integrating theory, group skills and authentic presence.

Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2016
Same author

The impact of a program in mindful communication on primary care physicians.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2012
Same author

Organizations as machines, organizations as conversations: two core metaphors and their consequences.

Medical care·2010
Same author

Association of an educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among primary care physicians.

JAMA·2009
Same journal

Enhancing clinical skills and interprofessional collaboration: exploring the benefits of visual thinking strategies in a pediatric hospital setting.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence in interprofessional education and collaborative practice: towards a research agenda.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
Same journal

Validity and reliability of the modified Attitudes Toward Health Care Teams Scale translated into the native languages of four countries.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of interprofessional implementation approaches in dementia care for patients and caregivers.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
Same journal

Interprofessional education in pharmacology: students' attitudes and perceptions across pharmacy, nursing, and medicine.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
Same journal

Translation and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Interprofessional Education Academic Behavioral Confidence Scale (IPE-ABC).

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
See all related articles

Contrasting control and relation philosophies reveals that a control-based approach can harm health outcomes. Embracing relation enhances adaptability and partnerships for better health.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • Explores personal philosophies centered on control versus relation.
  • Examines impact on expectations, relationships, perception, and grounding.
  • Highlights prevalence of the control paradigm in healthcare.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To contrast the 'control' and 'relation' paradigms in personal philosophies.
  • To analyze their effects on health expectations, social dynamics, and well-being.
  • To propose an integrated clinical approach for improved health outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical exploration and contrast of two core value systems.
  • Analysis of the implications of each paradigm on psychological and social factors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of the impact of each paradigm on health outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • The control paradigm fosters unrealistic expectations, fear, and shame, potentially compromising health.
    • The relation paradigm promotes receptivity and adaptability, enhancing interpersonal partnerships.
    • Effective partnerships are inhibited by the control paradigm but fostered by the relation paradigm.

    Conclusions:

    • A mature clinical approach integrates both control and relation perspectives.
    • Acknowledging limitations of reductionistic science and embracing self-organization is key.
    • Combining paradigms enhances adaptability, partnership, and ultimately, health outcomes.