Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

10:35
Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Outcome following deep wound contamination in cemented arthroplasty
A M Byrne1, S Morris, T McCarthy
1Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Dublin, 11, Ireland. ann_maria_byrne@hotmail.com
International Orthopaedics
|April 6, 2006
Summary
Intraoperative contamination during cemented joint replacement is common (22.5%), despite ultra-clean air theaters and isolation suits. However, this contamination did not lead to postoperative infections in the study group.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Disease Control
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Joint replacement surgery is susceptible to infection, a significant complication despite prophylactic measures.
- Current infection rates for cemented arthroplasty range from 1-2%, indicating persistent intraoperative contamination challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence and sources of perioperative contamination in cemented arthroplasty.
- To identify factors influencing contamination rates.
- To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with intraoperative contamination.
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of 80 patients undergoing cemented hip and knee arthroplasty over 6 months.
- Utilized total body exhaust isolation suits and ultra-clean air theaters for all procedures.
- Collected 441 samples to identify contamination incidence, organisms, and locations.
Main Results:
- Intraoperative contamination was detected in 22.5% of patients (21 of 441 samples).
- Longer surgery duration correlated with higher contamination rates.
- Reduced contamination was associated with fewer gowned personnel and fewer total personnel in the operating theater.
Conclusions:
- A high incidence of intraoperative contamination occurs in cemented arthroplasty, even with stringent protocols.
- Perioperative contamination did not translate to deep prosthetic infections in this cohort.
- Potential factors mitigating infection include small bacterial load or antibiotic prophylaxis effectiveness.