Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses.

Robert C MacCallum1, Michael W Browne, Li Cai

  • 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Psychology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USA. rcm@email.unc.edu

Psychological Methods
|April 6, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adiposity Mediates the Association of Objectively Measured Physical Activity with Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Children.

Childhood obesity (Print)·2020
Same author

The Expression of VEGF and CD31 in Endometrial Lesions and Its Associations with Blood Flow Parameters of Transvaginal 3D Power Doppler Ultrasonography: A Preliminary Study.

Cancer management and research·2020
Same author

Sclerosing pneumocytoma mixed with a columnar clear cell adenoma and a typical carcinoid: case report and review of literature.

International journal of clinical and experimental pathology·2020
Same author

Predictive Nomogram for Severe COVID-19 and Identification of Mortality-Related Immune Features.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice·2020
Same author

Stimuli-Responsive Biomass Cellulose Particles Being Able to Reversibly Self-Assemble at Fluid Interface.

Frontiers in chemistry·2020
Same author

Targeting 14-3-3ζ Overcomes Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Lung Adenocarcinoma via BMP2/Smad/ID1 Signaling.

Frontiers in oncology·2020
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Best practices in multilevel modeling for within-cluster group comparisons: An evaluation of coding strategies reflecting group composition and heterogeneity.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A unified framework for psychometrics in experimental psychology: The standardized generalized hierarchical factor model.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles

This study presents a new statistical power analysis for comparing nested models. It allows researchers to test for small differences in model fit, improving statistical accuracy in model selection.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychometrics
  • Quantitative Psychology

Background:

  • Comparing nested covariance structure models typically uses the likelihood ratio test.
  • The standard null hypothesis assumes identical model fit in the population, which may lack practical relevance.
  • Determining statistical power for these tests is crucial for accurate model comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a procedure for determining the statistical power of likelihood ratio tests for nested covariance structure models.
  • To introduce a modified null hypothesis that allows testing for a small, rather than zero, difference in model fit.
  • To develop a method for estimating power when testing a null hypothesis of a small difference against an alternative of a larger difference.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developed an effect size measure based on a specified difference in overall model fit.
  • Proposed modifying the standard null hypothesis to an interval hypothesis (small difference in fit).
  • Combined these developments to create a power estimation procedure for the modified hypothesis.

    • Main Results:

    • A procedure for statistical power analysis in comparing nested covariance structure models is presented.
    • The method incorporates effect size based on model fit differences.
    • The procedure allows for power estimation under a null hypothesis of a small difference in fit.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed method enhances statistical power analysis for nested model comparisons.
    • Testing for a small difference in fit offers a more practical approach than testing for zero difference.
    • This procedure aids researchers in making more informed decisions about model selection and statistical power.