Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth rates

L K Smith1, E S Draper, B N Manktelow

  • 1Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK. lks1@le.ac.uk

Insights

Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth persist, with the most deprived individuals nearly twice as likely to experience this outcome. This persistent gap highlights the need for targeted interventions to reduce disparities in preterm birth rates.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Perinatal Health

Background:

  • Socioeconomic status is a known determinant of adverse birth outcomes.
  • Preterm birth, particularly very preterm birth, carries significant risks for infant morbidity and mortality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of very preterm birth over a decade.
  • To assess the persistence of these inequalities across different levels of deprivation.

Main Methods:

  • Ecological study of singleton births (22-32 weeks gestation) in the Trent health region, UK (1994-2003).
  • Poisson regression analysis to determine incidence rates by year and decile of deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation).

Main Results:

  • Incidence of very preterm birth increased from 11.9 to 13.7 per 1000 births between 1994 and 2003.
  • Individuals in the most deprived decile had nearly double the risk of very preterm birth (IRR 1.94) compared to the least deprived.
  • This socioeconomic disparity remained consistent throughout the study period for both very preterm and extremely preterm births.

Conclusions:

  • Wide and persistent socioeconomic inequalities exist in very preterm birth incidence.
  • These disparities have implications for long-term infant morbidity.
  • Findings support the need for targeted interventions and monitoring to address the persistent deprivation gap in perinatal health.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Environmental Influences on Intelligence01:29

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Despite the strong genetic influence on traits like intelligence, environmental factors significantly shape outcomes. For example, while over 90% of height variation is due to genetic differences, environmental factors such as nutrition also have a notable impact. Similarly, for intelligence, changes in a child's surroundings can significantly alter their IQ. Research shows that enriched environments boost children's academic success and help them develop key cognitive skills. Children from...
Development of the Oral Microbiota01:28

Development of the Oral Microbiota

The establishment of the oral microbiome begins before birth, challenging the long-held belief that the fetal oral cavity is sterile. The presence of oral microbes such as Streptococcus and Fusobacterium in amniotic fluid suggests that microbial exposure may occur in utero, potentially through translocation from the maternal oral or gastrointestinal tract. This early colonization primes the neonatal immune system and sets the stage for subsequent microbial succession. Maternal health,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Prevalence and Incidence01:08

Prevalence and Incidence

In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...