Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026
Cognitive Function and Upper Limb Rehabilitation Training Post-Stroke Using a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
The value of an evidence database for occupational therapists: an international online survey
Sally Bennett1, Kryss McKenna, Tammy Hoffmann
1Division of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Qld 4072, Australia. sally.bennett@uq.edu.au
Background:
Online evidence databases can provide access to high quality evidence at the point of care, making evidence-based practice more achievable. A discipline-specific online bibliographic database called OTseeker (www.otseeker.com) was designed for use by occupational therapists. The database is free, and contains citations and abstracts of systematic reviews, and critically appraised randomized controlled trials relevant to occupational therapy.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to investigate search practices of database users, their views on its functionality, and the reported impact, if any, on their practice from using OTseeker.
Design:
An online survey, placed on the database website for 30 days.
Sample:
Potential participants were users of OTseeker during a 30-day period. A total of 498 people who had used the database more than once from over 40 countries completed the survey.
Results:
Three hundred and nine (62%) participants believed that OTseeker had improved their ability to locate research about the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions, and 92 (19%) agreed that the information in the database had contributed to a change in practice. Those reporting no practice changes agreed that use of OTseeker had improved their knowledge generally (n=189; 38%), confirmed their practice (n=75; 15%), or revealed that there was insufficient research relevant to their search topic (n=92; 19%). Features of the database which helped respondents locate research evidence included: having discipline-specific content, providing critical appraisal ratings for randomized controlled trials, and presenting search results ranked for methodological quality.
Conclusion:
This study confirms the value of a discipline-specific, online database for helping occupational therapists locate high quality research evidence. Information located on databases such as OTseeker can help change or confirm practice, and improve knowledge.