Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026
Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
Published on: November 16, 2017
ERPs and deviance detection: visual mismatch negativity to repeated visual stimuli
István Czigler1, Júlia Weisz, István Winkler
1Institute for Psychology of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary. czigler@cogpsyphy.hu
Abstract:
Previous studies showed a visual analogue of the mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential (ERP), which is elicited by violating some sensory regularity. Separating physical change from violating a regularity, here we show that the visual MMN (vMMN) is elicited by regularity violations that do not involve physical stimulus change. Adult participants were presented with a series of red-black and green-black checkerboard patterns delivered regularly in an RRGGRRGG ... order. Infrequently (p=0.1) this regularity was broken by repeating a stimulus one additional time (e.g. RRGGRRR). ERPs elicited by irregular stimulus repetitions were negatively displaced compared to those elicited both by regular repetition and regular change in two latency ranges: 100-140 ms and 220-260 ms. Whereas the first of these two negative ERP differences appears to be sensitive to stimulus repetition per se, the second difference can be identified as a vMMN response to violating the sequential regularity. Thus, similarly to its auditory counterpart, vMMN reflects deviance-(regularity-violation) rather than change-detection processes.
Insights
This study demonstrates that the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) brain response is triggered by violations of sequential patterns, not just physical changes. This finding clarifies that vMMN reflects deviance detection rather than simple change detection.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Visual Perception
Background:
- The mismatch negativity (MMN) is an event-related potential (ERP) linked to auditory regularity violations.
- A visual analogue, the visual MMN (vMMN), has been proposed but requires further differentiation from physical change detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether the visual MMN (vMMN) is elicited by regularity violations independent of physical stimulus change.
- To differentiate vMMN's role in deviance detection versus change detection.
Main Methods:
- Adult participants viewed sequences of red-black and green-black checkerboards presented in a regular RRGGRRGG order.
- Irregularities were introduced by infrequent single stimulus repetitions (e.g., RRGGRRR).
- Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded and analyzed for differences between regular and irregular sequences.
Main Results:
- Negative ERP deflections were observed in two latency windows (100-140 ms and 220-260 ms) for irregular repetitions.
- The earlier ERP difference (100-140 ms) was sensitive to stimulus repetition itself.
- The later ERP difference (220-260 ms) was identified as a vMMN response to the regularity violation.
Conclusions:
- The visual MMN (vMMN) is elicited by violations of sequential regularities, even without physical stimulus change.
- vMMN functions as a deviance detection mechanism, analogous to its auditory counterpart.
- This research distinguishes vMMN's role in processing rule violations from simple change detection.
More Related Videos
08:17A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential (ERP) Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published on: April 12, 2018
09:52How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
Published on: May 31, 2018
