Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: a comparative study.

H Baumert1, A Ballaro, F Dugardin

  • 1Fondation Hôpital Saint Joseph, Paris, France. baumertherve@yahoo.fr

The Journal of Urology
|April 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of open and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy approaches using multicentric data (UroCCR-47 study).

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

[Surgical and interventional management of benign prostatic obstruction: Guidelines from the Committee for Male Voiding Disorders of the French Urology Association].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2021
Same author

[An update on the most recent mini-invasive surgical and interventional techniques in the management of benign prostatic obstruction].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2020
Same author

[Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: Analysis of early complications. Patient selection for day-case surgery].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2020
Same author

[Salvage cryotherapy of prostate cancer after failed external radiotherapy and brachytherapy: Morbidity and mid-term oncological results].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2018
Same author

[Not Available].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015
Same journal

On the Memoryless Property in Markov Models for NMIBC Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Multi-institutional Assessment of Performance Metrics for MRI-targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Urinary Supersaturation in a Randomized Trial among Individuals with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis comparing Empiric versus Selective Preventive Therapy: The URINE Trial.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

The FDA Should Allow More BCG Strains into the US Market: How Recent Landmark Trials Expose a Regulatory Paradox.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Let's Shift the Focus from Death to Life after Fournier's Gangrene.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Endourology and Nephrolithiasis.

The Journal of urology·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy offers significant advantages over open surgery for large prostate adenomas, including reduced blood loss, shorter catheterization, and hospital stays. This minimally invasive approach shows promise for treating bladder outflow obstruction.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Large prostatic adenomas can cause bladder outflow obstruction, necessitating surgical intervention.
  • Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy is a developing technique for managing these conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic simple prostatectomy versus traditional open simple prostatectomy.
  • To define the advantages of the laparoscopic approach for removing large prostatic adenomas.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective data collection for 30 laparoscopic simple prostatectomies and retrospective data for 30 open simple prostatectomies.
  • Comparison of perioperative parameters, including blood loss, catheterization duration, hospital stay, and operative time.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy demonstrated significantly less blood loss, shorter irrigation and catheterization times, and reduced hospital stays compared to the open approach.
  • While operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group, functional outcomes and complication rates were comparable.
  • A majority of laparoscopic cases (24/30) did not require bladder irrigation.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy presents inherent advantages over the open technique for treating large prostatic adenomas.
  • Further research is warranted to establish laparoscopic simple prostatectomy as the preferred treatment for prostates too large for endoscopic resection.