Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Factors influencing cup orientation in 500 consecutive total hip replacements.

M Rittmeister1, C Callitsis

  • 1University Hospital for Orthopaedic Surgery Foundation Friedrichsheim, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. m.rittmeister@friedrichsheim.de

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|April 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Nearly 20% of acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty fall outside safe orientation ranges. However, this cup malposition did not increase dislocation risk, suggesting a need for refined surgical techniques.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Treatment of the ankle joint in rheumatoid arthritis with surgical and radiation synovectomy.

Der Orthopade·2017
Same author

[Comparison of total hip arthroplasty via a posterior mini-incision versus a classic anterolateral approach].

Der Orthopade·2006
Same author

Triple osteotomy of the pelvis for acetabular dysplasia: age at operation and the incidence of nonunions and other complications influence outcome.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2005
Same author

[A posterior mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty -- results of 76 consecutive cases].

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete·2005
Same author

[Assessment of implant position of CTX-custom-made stems with EBRA-FCA in 107 cases of total joint replacement].

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete·2004
Same author

[Reimplantation of the artificial hip joint in girdlestone hips is superior to girdlestone arthroplasty by itself].

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete·2004

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Surgical outcomes

Background:

  • Acetabular cup orientation is critical for total hip arthroplasty (THA) success.
  • Variability in cup placement may influence dislocation rates and long-term implant survival.
  • Establishing safe ranges for cup inclination and anteversion is essential for consistent surgical outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the percentage of acetabular components placed outside established safe orientation parameters in THA.
  • To evaluate the association between cup orientation (inclination and anteversion) and dislocation risk.
  • To identify factors influencing acetabular cup orientation, including patient BMI, preoperative coverage, surgeon, and surgical approach.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 500 total hip arthroplasties performed at a single institution.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of acetabular cup orientation (inclination and anteversion) in all cases.
  • Comparison of dislocation rates between cups within and outside the presumed safe orientation zones.
  • Statistical analysis to determine the influence of body mass index, acetabular head coverage, surgeon, and minimally invasive technique on cup orientation.

    • Main Results:

    • 19.8% of acetabular cups exceeded the safe range for inclination, and 11.2% exceeded the safe range for anteversion.
    • No significant difference in dislocation rates was observed between cups placed within or outside the safe orientation zones.
    • Acetabular cup orientation was significantly influenced by preoperative acetabular head coverage, the surgeon, and the use of minimally invasive techniques, but not by patient body mass index.
    • Considerable variability in cup orientation was noted across multiple experienced surgeons.

    Conclusions:

    • A significant percentage of acetabular cups are placed outside the presumed safe orientation range in THA.
    • Cup orientation outside the safe zone did not correlate with an increased risk of dislocation in this cohort.
    • Surgical factors, including surgeon experience, patient-specific anatomy, and surgical approach, play a crucial role in acetabular component placement variability.
    • Continuous refinement of surgical techniques and instrumentation is recommended to improve consistency in acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty.