Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Moving from voluntary euthanasia to non-voluntary euthanasia: equality and compassion.

Kumar Amaraskekara1, Mirko Bagaric

  • 1Deakin University, School of Law, Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, Australia 3125.

Ratio Juris
|April 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Addressing a Human Rights Crisis: Health Care for Prisoners in Australia.

Journal of law and medicine·2024
Same author

Legal Implications of Personal Protective Equipment Use When Treating Patients for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2).

Journal of law and medicine·2020
Same author

Assisted suicide through the prism of the right to life.

International journal of law and psychiatry·2013
Same author

Causation in negligence: from anti-jurisprudence to principle--individual responsibility as the cornerstone for the attribution of liability.

Journal of law and medicine·2011
Same author

The moral status of wrongful life claims.

Common law world review·2005
Same author

Fat and the law: who should take the blame?

Journal of law and medicine·2005

Legalizing voluntary euthanasia may lead to non-voluntary euthanasia for incompetent patients. A lack of a "best interests" test makes this path ethically problematic, arguing against legalizing voluntary euthanasia.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Law and Medicine
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • The recent Dutch law legalizing active voluntary euthanasia has reignited the global euthanasia debate.
  • Compassion is a central argument for voluntary active euthanasia, extending to incompetent patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the moral implications of legalizing active voluntary euthanasia by examining its logical consequences.
  • To assess the ethical permissibility of extending euthanasia to incompetent patients.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical argumentation analyzing the implications of legalizing euthanasia.
  • Review of legal and ethical authorities regarding patient best interests.

Main Results:

  • Legalizing active voluntary euthanasia could logically lead to pressure for active non-voluntary euthanasia for incompetent patients.
Keywords:
Airedale NHS Trust v. BlandAnalytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaInternational Covenant on Civil and Political RightsLegal Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Arguments of compassion and equality may drive the push for non-voluntary euthanasia.
  • A coherent and workable "best interests" test for determining the wishes of incompetent patients does not exist.

    • Conclusions:

    • The lack of a reliable "best interests" test presents a significant ethical barrier.
    • Permitting active voluntary euthanasia may initiate a "slippery slope" towards undesirable non-voluntary euthanasia.
    • This ethical analysis provides a strong reason to refrain from legalizing active voluntary euthanasia.