Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of lung function equipment with emphasis on interchangeability and methods.

Paul Munnik1, Pieter Zanen, Jan-Willem J Lammers

  • 1Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Physiological Measurement
|April 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Comparing lung function equipment from ZAN and Jaeger revealed significant differences in peak expiratory flow and maximal expiratory flow measurements. Standard calibration methods may not detect these variations, highlighting the need for improved in vitro testing for accurate spirometry and diffusion capacity assessments.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vitamin K2 Supplementation in Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Journal of clinical medicine·2024
Same author

Serum Biomarker Profile Including CCL1, CXCL10, VEGF, and Adenosine Deaminase Activity Distinguishes Active From Remotely Acquired Latent Tuberculosis.

Frontiers in immunology·2021
Same author

Waiting List Dynamics and Lung Transplantation Outcomes After Introduction of the Lung Allocation Score in The Netherlands.

Transplantation direct·2021
Same author

A Career Crafting Training Program: Results of an Intervention Study.

Frontiers in psychology·2021
Same author

Progression of Emphysema and Small Airways Disease in Cigarette Smokers.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)·2020
Same author

<i>Post hoc</i> analysis of a randomised controlled trial: effect of vitamin D supplementation on circulating levels of desmosine in COPD.

ERJ open research·2020

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonary Function Testing
  • Medical Device Calibration
  • Respiratory Diagnostics

Background:

  • Accurate lung function equipment is crucial for consistent patient monitoring and diagnosis.
  • Transitions between different equipment models or manufacturers should ideally be seamless.
  • Existing calibration methods may not fully capture performance differences between devices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare lung function equipment from ZAN and Jaeger, evaluating spirometry, bodyplethysmography, and diffusion capacity parameters.
  • To assess the effectiveness of different calibration systems in detecting equipment-induced variations.
  • To identify discrepancies in measurements caused by differences in equipment design and calibration.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of Jaeger (Masterlab, Pneumoscreen, Masterscreen CS-FRC, Masterlab CompactTransfer) and ZAN equipment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • In vitro studies using a 2-liter calibration syringe, fixed flow generator, and waveform generator.
  • In vivo cross-over study with 59 participants to compare pneumotachographs and other parameters.

    • Main Results:

    • In vitro calibration syringe and fixed flow generator studies showed minimal volume and flow differences (<3%).
    • Waveform generator revealed up to 10-15% differences in Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) and Maximal Expiratory Flow (MEF) rates, but not FEV1 or FVC.
    • In vivo study showed significant differences in PEF and MEF (up to 29%), small differences in FEV1, FVC, VC (<3%), and Transfer Factor for Carbon Monoxide (T(L,CO)) (up to 9%).

    Conclusions:

    • Significant differences exist between and within manufacturers' pneumotachographs, often undetected by standard calibration methods.
    • Current in vitro calibration methods (syringes, fixed flow) are insufficient for testing dynamic features of pneumotachographs.
    • In vivo calibration is essential for accurate assessment of most lung function parameters, necessitating larger sample sizes or improved in vitro systems for research.