Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamical principles of two-component genetic oscillators.

Raúl Guantes1, Juan F Poyatos

  • 1Instituto Nicolás Cabrera, Facultad de Ciencias C-XVI, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Plos Computational Biology
|April 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Genetic circuit designs significantly alter oscillator dynamics. One design integrates stimuli with variable frequencies, while another resonates with consistent frequencies, impacting cellular processes and synthetic biology.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A transformer-based language model reveals developmental constraint and network complexity during zebrafish embryogenesis.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Cell atlases and the developmental foundations of the phenotype.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Polygenic prediction and gene regulation networks.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

Disentangling protein metabolic costs in human cells and tissues.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Design principles of multi-map variation in biological systems.

Physical biology·2024
Same author

Virus-host protein co-expression networks reveal temporal organization and strategies of viral infection.

iScience·2023

Area of Science:

  • Systems Biology
  • Synthetic Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Genetic oscillators regulate fundamental cellular processes like cell cycle and circadian rhythms.
  • Understanding these oscillators is key to deciphering complex biological clocks and cellular functions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different genetic implementations of a minimal two-component oscillator affect its dynamic properties.
  • To compare the behaviors of transcriptional versus post-translational repression in genetic oscillator designs.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling a minimal two-component genetic oscillator with a repressor and activator.
  • Implementing repression at either the transcriptional (Design I) or post-translational (Design II) level.
  • Analyzing oscillatory features, response to molecular noise, and entrainment by periodic signals.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Design I (transcriptional repression) produced oscillations with large amplitudes and low frequencies, acting as a stimulus integrator.
  • Design II (post-translational repression) generated oscillations with finite, stable frequencies and smaller amplitudes, functioning as a resonator.
  • The two designs exhibited distinct responses to external stimuli and molecular noise.

Conclusions:

  • Genetic implementation critically influences the functional properties of molecular oscillators.
  • The distinct dynamical principles observed (integrator vs. resonator) have implications for understanding biological clocks and designing synthetic circuits.
  • This work bridges insights from genetic oscillators to neuronal stimulus response, highlighting conserved dynamical principles.