Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Size correction: comparing morphological traits among populations and environments.

Michael W McCoy1, Benjamin M Bolker, Craig W Osenberg

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8525, USA. mmccoy@zoo.ufl.edu

Oecologia
|April 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Researchers found that common statistical methods for studying body size and morphology differences between populations are flawed. A new method, common principal components analysis with Burnaby

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coral-associated fishes accelerate coral wound healing and photosynthetic recovery.

Biology letters·2026
Same author

A century of weekly notifiable disease incidence data by province in Canada.

PLOS global public health·2025
Same author

Ecological meta-analyses often produce unwarranted results.

Ecology·2025
Same author

Widespread Heterogeneity in Density-Dependent Mortality of Nearshore Fishes.

Ecology letters·2025
Same author

Warmer Is Deadlier: A Meta-Analysis Reveals Increasing Temperatures Accentuate Disease Effects on Fisheries Hosts.

Ecology letters·2025
Same author

Genetic diversity and population structure of parasite infrapopulations within and across hosts for two trophically transmitted trematode parasites.

PeerJ·2025

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Morphometrics
  • Quantitative genetics

Background:

  • Morphological variation across populations is influenced by body size.
  • Accurate analysis of trait variation requires adjusting for body size differences.
  • Current methods like ANCOVA and residuals analysis have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify biases in common statistical approaches for analyzing morphological variation.
  • To present and validate a more robust alternative method.

Main Methods:

  • Critique of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and residuals analysis.
  • Introduction of common principal components analysis (CPCA).
  • Application of Burnaby's back-projection method with CPCA.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • ANCOVA assumptions are often violated in morphometric studies.
  • Residuals analysis can be based on untested assumptions of equal scaling.
  • Pooled data scaling relationships may not reflect within-group patterns.
  • CPCA combined with back-projection offers a more accurate assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Standard methods for analyzing among-population morphological variation can be misleading.
  • Common principal components analysis with Burnaby's back-projection is a superior alternative.
  • This improved approach allows for more reliable quantification of allometric differences.