Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
Automated vs. manual assessment of left ventricular function in cardiac multidetector row computed tomography:
Andreas H Mahnken1, Georg Mühlenbruch, Ralf Koos
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. mahnken@rad.rwth-aachen.de
Insights
Semiautomatic and manual contour tracing in cardiac computed tomography (MDCT) accurately calculate left-ventricular (LV) volumes, showing good agreement with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Further improvements in automated detection are needed for parity with manual methods.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
Background:
- Accurate calculation of left-ventricular (LV) volumes is crucial for diagnosing and managing cardiac conditions.
- Cardiac multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are key imaging modalities for cardiac assessment.
- Contour tracing, whether manual or automated, is fundamental for volumetric analysis in cardiac imaging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of semiautomatic contour detection versus manual contour tracing in cardiac MDCT for calculating LV volumes.
- To evaluate the agreement of LV volume calculations from cardiac MDCT (using both methods) against cardiac cine-MRI, considered the reference standard.
- To assess the feasibility of using MDCT for LV volume quantification relative to MRI.
Main Methods:
- Thirty patients underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MDCT and cardiac cine-MRI.
- LV volumes, peak ejection rate, and peak filling rate were calculated from 8 mm short-axis MDCT slices using 3D multiphase reconstruction.
- Manual and semiautomatic contours were applied to MDCT data; manual contours on cine-MRI served as the reference standard.
Main Results:
- Good agreement was observed for LV volumes across all methods: manual MDCT (47.1+/-9.4%), semiautomatic MDCT (47.9+/-9.9%), and MRI (48.0+/-10.2%).
- Analysis of variance showed no significant differences between techniques for most parameters, except for peak filling rate.
- Bland-Altman plots and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient indicated the best agreement between MRI and manual contour tracing on MDCT.
Conclusions:
- Both semiautomatic and manual contour tracing in cardiac MDCT are feasible and reliable for calculating LV volumes when compared to MRI.
- The findings support the use of MDCT for LV volume assessment, with manual tracing showing slightly better concordance with MRI.
- Further development is required to enhance automated contour detection methods to match the accuracy of manual contour tracing.
Abstract:
We compared semiautomatic contour detection and manual contour tracing in cardiac multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for calculation of left-ventricular (LV) volumes. The study included 30 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MDCT and cardiac cine-MRI. Were calculated 8 mm short-axis slices from MDCT data using three-dimensional multiphase image reconstruction. LV volumes including peak ejection rate and peak filling rate were calculated from manually and semiautomatically determined contours. Results were compared to those from cine-MRI with manually drawn contours as the standard of reference. We found good agreement for the LV volumes, with an ejection fraction of 47.1+/-9.4% for manually drawn contours, 47.9+/-9.9% for semiautomatically detected contours on MDCT, and 48.0+/-10.2% for MRI. Except for peak-filling rate analysis of variance revealed no difference between any of these techniques. Bland-Altman plots and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient showed best agreement between MRI and manual contour tracing in MDCT. Calculation of LV volumes using either semiautomatic or manual contour tracing in cardiac MDCT is therefore feasible when compared to MRI. Automated contour detection needs to be improved to equal manual contour tracing.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging