Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

08:46
A Standardized Method for Measuring Internal Lung Surface Area via Mouse Pneumonectomy and Prosthesis Implantation
Published on: July 26, 2017
The BODE index after lung volume reduction surgery correlates with survival
Stephan Imfeld1, Konrad E Bloch, Walter Weder
1Pulmonary Division, University Hospital, Raemistr. 100, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland. erich.russi@usz.ch
Chest
|April 13, 2006
Summary
The BODE index effectively predicts survival in COPD patients post-lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). A lower postoperative BODE score significantly reduces mortality risk, outperforming other key indicators.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonary Medicine
- Surgical Outcomes Research
- Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation
Background:
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) poses significant mortality risks.
- Lung Volume Reduction Surgery (LVRS) is a treatment option for severe emphysema.
- Predictive indices are crucial for patient selection and prognosis after LVRS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the BODE index's ability to predict survival in COPD patients undergoing LVRS.
- To compare the predictive power of the BODE index against individual components like FEV1 and dyspnea.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 186 COPD patients undergoing bilateral thoracoscopic LVRS.
- Assessment of BODE index components (BMI, FEV1, dyspnea, 6MWD) pre- and post-surgery.
- Survival follow-up for a median of 40 months.
Main Results:
- The BODE index significantly decreased post-LVRS (7.2 to 4.0, p < 0.001).
- Postoperative BODE index strongly correlated with survival, unlike the preoperative index.
- A lower BODE score class post-surgery was associated with reduced mortality (HR 0.497).
- The BODE index demonstrated superior predictive ability (C-statistic 0.74) compared to FEV1 (0.63), dyspnea (0.64), or 6MWD (0.62).
Conclusions:
- The postoperative BODE index is a powerful and reliable predictor of survival in COPD patients after LVRS.
- The BODE index offers a more comprehensive prognostic assessment than individual clinical parameters.
