Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On complicity theory.

A David Kline1

  • 1BlueCross BlueShield Center for Ethics, Public Policy and the Professions, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. akline@unf.edu

Science and Engineering Ethics
|April 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Giftedness, humility and genetic enhancement.

Human reproduction and genetic ethics·2007
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

This paper critiques Michael Davis's Complicity Theory of whistleblowing. It argues the theory fails to explain public support for whistleblowers despite potential corporate harm, strengthening the received view.

Area of Science:

  • Business Ethics
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Philosophy of Technology

Background:

  • The received view of whistleblowing, established by Bowie and DeGeorge, faces challenges from Michael Davis's Complicity Theory.
  • Davis identified three anomalies: burden, missing harm, and failure, proposing Complicity Theory as an alternative framework.
  • Case studies like the Challenger disaster and Ford Pinto are often cited in whistleblowing discussions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine Michael Davis's Complicity Theory of whistleblowing.
  • To re-evaluate the anomalies presented against the received view of whistleblowing.
  • To strengthen the understanding of the received view by contrasting it with Complicity Theory.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of whistleblowing theories.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critique of Michael Davis's Complicity Theory.
  • Re-examination of model cases of whistleblowing.
  • Comparative analysis between the received view and Complicity Theory.

    • Main Results:

    • The anomalies cited by Davis appear to stem from misunderstandings of the received view or misinterpretations of whistleblowing cases.
    • Comparison with Complicity Theory reinforces key aspects of the received view, particularly the necessity of moral justification for whistleblowing.
    • Complicity Theory inadequately explains the societal encouragement and protection of whistleblowers, especially when significant corporate harm is possible.

    Conclusions:

    • The received view of whistleblowing remains robust, with its core tenets clarified through contrast with Complicity Theory.
    • Complicity Theory's explanatory gap regarding public support for whistleblowers highlights a critical limitation.
    • Further research is needed to reconcile the ethical imperatives of whistleblowing with potential economic consequences for organizations.