Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Waterproof versus cotton cast liners: a randomized, prospective comparison.

Chad A Haley1, E Schuyler DeJong, John A Ward

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Womack Army Medical Center, 2817 Reilly Road, Fort Bragg, NC 28310, USA. chad.haley@amedd.army.mil

American Journal of Orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)
|April 14, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Waterproof cast liners significantly improve patient comfort and skin condition compared to traditional cotton liners. This innovation reduces common casting complications like itching and irritation for better extremity injury recovery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Next-generation tourniquet: Recommendations for future capabilities and design requirements.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2024
Same author

Rethinking limb tourniquet conversion in the prehospital environment.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2023
Same author

Warning: Tourniquets Risk Frostbite in Cold Weather.

Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals·2023
Same author

Influence of Graft Type on Lower Extremity Functional Test Performance and Failure Rate After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Sports health·2022
Same author

A High-Sensitivity International Knee Documentation Committee Survey Index From the PROMIS System: The Next-Generation Patient-Reported Outcome for a Knee Injury Population.

The American journal of sports medicine·2021
Same author

Exploring Tourniquet Conversion in Simulation to Develop Concepts and Hypotheses.

Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals·2021

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Patient Care

Background:

  • Conventional cast liners retain moisture, leading to complications like itching, odor, rashes, and skin maceration.
  • Inability to wash the extremity due to water retention in traditional casts compromises hygiene and comfort.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of a waterproof cast liner in improving patient comfort and skin condition.
  • To compare outcomes between patients using waterproof liners versus conventional cotton liners for extremity injuries.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 59 patients (age >= 10 years) with extremity injuries.
  • Patients were assigned to either a waterproof-liner group (n=29) or a cotton-liner group (n=30), both using fiberglass casts.
  • Patient-reported comfort and physician-assessed skin condition were evaluated via questionnaires at clinic visits.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The waterproof-liner group reported significantly better scores for itch (P = .008), discomfort (P < .001), and irritation (P = .002).
  • Overall patient satisfaction scores (P = .012) and physician assessments (P = .049) were also superior in the waterproof-liner group.
  • Waterproof liners demonstrated a clear advantage in mitigating common casting-related adverse effects.

Conclusions:

  • Waterproof cast liners offer a significant improvement in patient comfort and skin health over traditional cotton liners.
  • This technology addresses key limitations of conventional casting, enhancing the patient experience during recovery from extremity injuries.
  • The findings support the adoption of waterproof liners for routine orthopedic casting to improve patient outcomes.