Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The coaching schematic: validation through expert coach consensus.

Andy Abraham1, Dave Collins, Russell Martindale

  • 1School of Social Studies, Bell College, Hamilton, South Lanarkshire, UK. a.abraham@bell.ac.uk

Journal of Sports Sciences
|April 14, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Jumping through hoops: (How) does basketball help develop young female athletes?

Psychology of sport and exercise·2026
Same author

Self-report of 24-h urine completeness compared with <i>para</i>-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) recovery does not bias estimates of dietary salt intake in the UK.

The British journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Team decision-making: the integration of cognitive task analysis and video to accelerate the development of tactical shared mental models in an elite sports team.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2025
Same author

"Everybody wants to coach it, but fewer know how to do it": a qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives on mental skill development in youth sports.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2025
Same author

Measurement error in total energy intake in the United Kingdom National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008-2015).

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2025
Same author

Insights from the first IOC Olympian Health Cohort: injury and illness in Olympians preparing for the Tokyo 2020 Summer and Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic Games.

BMJ open sport & exercise medicine·2025
Same journal

The effect of sport-specific virtual reality training for soccer players on cognitive performance and related brain processing.

Journal of sports sciences·2026
Same journal

Physical activity as a moderator between problematic social media use and mental health in adolescents.

Journal of sports sciences·2026
Same journal

Transparency Statement.

Journal of sports sciences·2026
Same journal

Partial evidence for fine construct validity of a virtual reality batting test for women's pathway cricketers.

Journal of sports sciences·2026
Same journal

Physical activity, but not sedentary behavior, affects bone mineral density: Insights from a comprehensive genome-wide cross-trait analysis.

Journal of sports sciences·2026
Same journal

Elevating the game: Pathway structures and the operationalisation of talent identification and development systems across world netball.

Journal of sports sciences·2026
See all related articles

A new coaching model schematic was developed to address the lack of a big picture approach in coaching development. Expert coaches validated this model, confirming its accuracy and utility for targeted coaching interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Coaching and Mentoring
  • Organizational Psychology
  • Human Resource Development

Background:

  • Current coaching development research primarily views coaching as a decision-making process.
  • Existing research lacks a holistic perspective, hindering its application to coaching development.
  • A comprehensive model is needed to guide coaching development effectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel schematic model of the coaching process.
  • To validate this model by assessing its accuracy in reflecting expert coaches' experiences.
  • To establish a foundation for targeted interventions in coaching development.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a coaching process schematic integrating content and information-processing perspectives.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducting semi-structured interviews with 16 expert coaches.
  • Analyzing interview data to elicit descriptions of coaching processes and gather feedback on the schematic.

    • Main Results:

    • Six emergent categories from interviews: Roles, Goals, Typical Actions, Required Knowledge, Support for the Schematic, and Factors Influencing Development.
    • The first four categories implicitly supported the schematic's accuracy.
    • All interviewed coaches explicitly endorsed the schematic, confirming its validity.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed schematic model accurately represents the coaching process from expert coaches' perspectives.
    • The validated schematic provides a robust framework for designing and implementing effective coaching development interventions.
    • This model addresses the need for a big picture approach in coaching research and practice.