Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Urgent cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure receiving inotropic
Yuval Konstantino1, Zaza Iakobishvili, Orna Arad
1Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Petah-Tikva, Israel.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may improve symptoms in severe heart failure (HF) patients on inotropic drugs. However, this study found a high 50% mortality rate, indicating significant risks alongside potential benefits.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Severe decompensated Class IV heart failure (HF) patients on intravenous inotropic therapy represent a high-risk group.
- The benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in this specific patient population remains largely unknown.
- Understanding CRT's role in advanced HF is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of urgent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation.
- To assess the impact of CRT on symptomatic improvement in patients with severe decompensated Class IV heart failure requiring inotropic support.
- To evaluate the short-term mortality associated with CRT in this challenging patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective identification of patients who underwent urgent CRT implantation for decompensated Class IV HF.
- Inclusion criteria specified the necessity of intravenous inotropic therapy prior to or during CRT implantation.
- Analysis of symptomatic response and mortality rates during follow-up.
Main Results:
- Eight out of ten patients (80%) with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy and prolonged QRS duration (median 170 ms) experienced symptomatic improvement after CRT.
- Despite clinical improvement, the study observed a significant 50% mortality rate within a median follow-up of 9.5 months.
- The median time from CRT implantation to death was 6 months, highlighting the critical condition of these patients.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is technically feasible in patients with severe decompensated Class IV heart failure receiving intravenous inotropic treatment.
- While CRT can lead to clinical improvement in a majority of these patients, the associated mortality risk remains substantial.
- Further research is warranted to refine patient selection and management strategies for CRT in this high-risk HF population.
Background:
It remains unknown whether patients with severe decompensated class IV heart failure (HF) receiving intravenous inotropic treatment benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Methods:
We identified patients who underwent urgent CRT implantation due to decompensated class IV HF necessitating intravenous inotropic therapy.
Results:
Of 10 patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy (median QRS duration of 170 ms), CRT implantation was associated with symptomatic improvement in 8 patients. The mortality rate was 50% during a median follow-up of 9.5 months, with a median CRT-to-death duration of 6 months.
Conclusions:
CRT was feasible among class IV patients receiving inotropic treatment and was associated with clinical improvement.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure I: Introduction

