Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Membrane binding domains.

James H Hurley1

  • 1Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. hurley@helix.nih.gov

Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta
|April 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural Mechanism and Cellular Restriction of Tau Seeding from Endolysosomes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The Human Autophagy Core Complexes.

Annual review of biochemistry·2026
Same author

Reconstitution of multistep recruitment of ULK1 to membranes in autophagy.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Structural basis for mTORC1 activation on the lysosomal membrane.

Nature·2025
Same author

In situ cryo-ET visualization of mitochondrial depolarization and mitophagic engulfment.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Reconstitution of BNIP3/NIX-mitophagy initiation reveals hierarchical flexibility of the autophagy machinery.

Nature cell biology·2025
Same journal

Cumulative Contents.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2020
Same journal

Molecular Basis of Disease Cumulative Contents.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2020
Same journal

General Subjects Cumulative Contents.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2020
Same journal

Erratum to 'on the role of exchangeable hydrogen bonds for the kinetics of P680<sup>+·</sup> Q<sub>A</sub> <sup>-·</sup> formation and P680<sup>+·</sup> Pheo<sup>-·</sup> recombination in photosystem II' [Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1276 (1996) 35-44].

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2019
Same journal

Oligomeric state of the light-harvesting complexes B800-850 and B875 from purple bacterium Rubrivivax gelatinosus in detergent solution.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2019
Same journal

Regulation of pigment content and enzyme activity in the cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. Mac grown in continuous light, a light-dark photoperiod, or darkness.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2019
See all related articles

Eukaryotic proteins use modular domains to bind cell membranes, a process crucial for cell signaling and trafficking. This review compares seven key membrane-binding domains (C1, C2, PH, FYVE, PX, ENTH, BAR) and their targeting mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Cell Biology
  • Biochemistry
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • Eukaryotic proteins utilize modular domains for cell membrane interactions.
  • These interactions are critical for regulating cellular signaling and trafficking pathways.
  • Understanding the mechanisms of membrane binding is essential for deciphering cellular functions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comparative overview of major membrane-binding protein domains.
  • To elucidate the structural, biochemical, and biophysical mechanisms underlying membrane targeting.
  • To highlight the diverse strategies employed by these domains to bind specific subcellular membranes.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of seven key membrane-binding domain families: C1, C2, PH, FYVE, PX, ENTH, and BAR.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of structural, biochemical, and biophysical studies on domain-membrane interactions.
  • Examination of the molecular determinants for specific membrane recognition and binding.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified seven major classes of membrane-binding domains (C1, C2, PH, FYVE, PX, ENTH, BAR).
    • Characterized the diverse mechanisms these domains employ, including specific headgroup interactions, hydrophobic penetration, electrostatic forces, and shape complementarity.
    • Demonstrated how these mechanisms enable precise targeting to specific subcellular membranes.

    Conclusions:

    • Membrane-binding domains are versatile modules with distinct yet complementary strategies for membrane association.
    • These domains play crucial roles in spatial and temporal regulation of cellular processes.
    • The comparative analysis provides a unified framework for understanding protein-membrane interactions in eukaryotes.