Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimation of direct causal effects.

Maya L Petersen1, Sandra E Sinisi, Mark J van der Laan

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, University of California, School of Public Health, Berkeley, California 94720-7360, USA. mayaliv@berkeley.edu

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|April 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

An approach to nonparametric inference on the causal dose-response function.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same author

A megastudy of behavioral interventions to promote frequent HIV testing among adults at high risk of HIV infection in Kenya and Uganda: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2026
Same author

Sequential invitations to FOBT screening and colorectal cancer incidence.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Powering RCTs for Marginal Effects With GLMs Using Prognostic Score Adjustment.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Machine learning to optimize precision in the analysis of randomized trials: A journey in pre-specified, yet data-adaptive learning.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Researchers can now estimate natural direct effects, which block an exposure

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiologic and clinical research methodology
  • Causal inference
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Estimating direct effects is crucial for understanding causal pathways in research.
  • Traditional multivariable regression for direct effects has limitations and requires strong assumptions.
  • Existing methods may not adequately address the complexities of interacting exposure and intermediate variables.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between controlled direct effects and natural direct effects using a counterfactual framework.
  • To present a novel estimation approach for natural direct effects.
  • To provide a method with less restrictive assumptions than previous approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the counterfactual framework to define and distinguish controlled and natural direct effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developed a new estimation strategy for natural direct effects.
  • Illustrated the concepts with practical examples.

    • Main Results:

    • Clearly distinguished between controlled direct effects (intermediate fixed) and natural direct effects (intermediate unblocked).
    • Proposed an estimation approach for natural direct effects implementable with standard statistical software.
    • The proposed method's assumptions are less restrictive compared to prior methodologies.

    Conclusions:

    • The counterfactual framework provides a clearer understanding of direct effects.
    • The novel estimation approach for natural direct effects offers a more flexible tool for researchers.
    • This work advances the methodology for causal inference in epidemiologic and clinical research.