Related Experiment Videos
Efficacy of stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease in 297 patients
Ya-ling Han1, Shou-li Wang, Quan-min Jin
1Department of Cardiology, Shenyang General Hospital of PLA, Shenyang 110016, China. hanyal@mail.sy.ln.cn
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using stenting, including drug-eluting stents (DES), is safe and effective for treating unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. The DES era showed significantly lower in-hospital and long-term adverse events compared to the pre-DES era.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease remains a topic of debate.
- Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of stenting, including bare metal stents and drug-eluting stents (DES), is crucial for LMCA treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and clinical outcomes of stenting for unprotected LMCA disease.
- To compare outcomes between the pre-DES and DES eras for LMCA stenting.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 297 consecutive patients undergoing PCI for LMCA lesions between September 1997 and December 2005.
- Comparison of in-hospital and clinical follow-up data between the pre-DES era (Sept 1997-Dec 2002) and the DES era (Jan 2003-Dec 2004).
Main Results:
- 368 coronary stents were successfully deployed in 295 patients; 2 patients required coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were 2.0%, with 14.5% MACE at follow-up (including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, subacute thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization).
- The DES era (Group II) demonstrated significantly lower in-hospital MACE (1.1% vs. 9.4%), and lower long-term MACE, TLR, and restenosis rates compared to the pre-DES era (Group I) (all P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Coronary stenting, particularly with DES, is technically successful and safe for treating unprotected LMCA lesions.
- New PCI strategies and devices like DES have led to improved in-hospital and long-term outcomes compared to CABG for LMCA disease.
Background:
Angioplasty in the unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) has been controversial. This study aims to evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of stenting, including bare metal stent and drug eluting stent (DES), for treatment of unprotected LMCA disease.
Methods:
Between September 1997 and December 2005, a total of 297 consecutive patients underwent percutanous coronary intervention (PCI) on LMCA lesions in our hospital. Their in-hospital data and clinical follow-up outcomes were analyzed and those in pre-DES "era" (group I, from September 1997 to December 2002) were compared with those in DES "era" (group II, from January 2003 to December 2004. Patients in 2005 for the time of follow-up less than one year were not included in this group).
Results:
Altogether 368 coronary stents were successfully deployed in 295 patients. Stents failed to be implanted after balloon predilation in two patients, who received coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) successfully. Bifurcation techniques for distal LMCA executed in 206 patients (69.4%, 206/297), included crossover stenting in 156 (75.7%), T stenting in 4 (1.9%), provisional T stenting in 28 (13.6%), kissing stenting in 5 (2.4%) and stent crushing in 13 (6.3%) patients. During their hospital stay, 5 (1.7%) patients died after PCI procedure, of which 4 died from cardiac origin and one of renal failure. The total in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were 2.0% (6/297). In the follow-up period, 19 patients (6.5%) died [15 (5.1%) of cardiac death and 4 of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI)]. Besides, 2 (0.7%) developed subacute thrombosis (SAT) and 16 (5.4%) performed target lesion revascularization (TLR). The total follow-up MACE was 14.5% (43/297). Further analysis also showed that, compared with patients in group I, those in group II apparently had more multi-vessel involvement (14.7% vs 81.9%, P < 0.001), and more bifurcation lesions (32.4% vs 72.2%, P < 0.001). After PCI, in-hospital MACE of group II was significantly lower than that in group I (1.1% vs 9.4%, P < 0.05). And the incidences of MACE, TLR and angiographic restenosis in group II were all significantly lower than those in group I (all P < 0.05) after one year follow-up.
Conclusions:
As new PCI strategies and intervention devices such as DES are developed, coronary stenting, which might have brought better in-hospital and long-term outcomes than CABG, are proved to be technically successful and can be safely applied for the treatment of LMCA lesions in the experienced center for coronary intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care